Find accurate and reliable answers to your questions on IDNLearn.com. Get timely and accurate answers to your questions from our dedicated community of experts who are here to help you.
Research results do not prove hypotheses because inductive reasoning is based on probabilities, not proof.
Inductive reasoning can be defined as a process that involves drawing and arriving at a general conclusion (conjecture), especially by critically observing a pattern that's based on a sequence, probabilities, or specific instances.
In Science, a hypothesis is primarily considered to be a tentative or an educated guess and it can be defined as a testable explanation for an observation or a specific experimentation (scientific) problem, especially by using the "if . . . then . . . because" format..
In this context, we can reasonably infer and logically deduce that research results do not prove hypotheses because inductive reasoning is based on probabilities, not proof.
Read more on hypothesis here: https://brainly.com/question/146342
#SPJ1