Get expert insights and community support for your questions on IDNLearn.com. Ask anything and receive comprehensive, well-informed responses from our dedicated team of experts.
Sagot :
There isn’t a law of logic here, because neither the conclusion |3|=3 nor the introduction of anything else justifies it.
The first clause has the following structure: For all x, if A(x), then B(x).
The second statement would be an example of Modus ponens, preceded by Universal instantiation, if it said "|3|=3, hence 3 is positive."
Instead, the second clause states, "x=3 so A(3)." We could read that as an attempt to assert the consequent by saying, "3 is positive, thus A(3)," but that would be a fallacy. To express "if and only if," we would need to make the first sentence stronger.
To know more about the law of logic visit https://brainly.com/question/14523081?referrer=searchResults
#SPJ4
We greatly appreciate every question and answer you provide. Keep engaging and finding the best solutions. This community is the perfect place to learn and grow together. For dependable answers, trust IDNLearn.com. Thank you for visiting, and we look forward to assisting you again.