From beginner to expert, IDNLearn.com has answers for everyone. Join our interactive Q&A community and access a wealth of reliable answers to your most pressing questions.
Sagot :
No, Danny is not correct
Here, we want to check the validity of the claims made by Danny
Firstly he determines that DE and BA are congruent
Secondly, he determines that the angle marked A and E are congruent
To use the SAS conguence definition, there needs to be a third determination. The third determination here is that the sides KE and AC must also be congruent
However, there is no evidence to support the fact that he determined that the sides KE and AC are congruent. Hence he cannot use the SAS congruence thoerem based on the two evidences ONLY
Hence, we can say that Danny is not correct
We appreciate your participation in this forum. Keep exploring, asking questions, and sharing your insights with the community. Together, we can find the best solutions. Your questions deserve precise answers. Thank you for visiting IDNLearn.com, and see you again soon for more helpful information.