IDNLearn.com: Your trusted source for finding accurate answers. Join our community to receive timely and reliable responses to your questions from knowledgeable professionals.
Since the argument doesn't address or rely on distinctions between the forest's edge surrounding dwellings and the forest's edge around roads, B is considerably out of bounds.
Consider, for instance, that deer are noticeably more drawn to the border of the forest near homes. Let's assume that 200 deer choose to forage along the highways, whereas 400 chose to forage near the homes. "The development (won't => won't) leave enough forest to support a sizable deer population." You can see that if there are less deer than before, the number of hits would decrease, which is obviously contrary to the argument. Since the argument is supported by the original version,
learn more about forest here:
https://brainly.com/question/23272188
#SPJ4