Discover how IDNLearn.com can help you learn and grow with its extensive Q&A platform. Ask anything and receive immediate, well-informed answers from our dedicated community of experts.

consider the following logic: 1. all animals need water. 2. dogs need water. 3. conclusion: therefore, dogs are animals. why do many people judge the conclusion of this syllogism to be valid?

Sagot :

A syllogism similar to the one below is typically used in references to demonstrate deductive reasoning. they assert that deductive reasoning investigates all alternatives after formulating a broad claim

One method for determining if the premises of a syllogism are true is through hypothesis testing. Keep in mind that the conclusion can only be true if the presuppositions are accurate and the logic is sound. Thus, all deductive reasoning involves a hypothesis and generates one. It relates to how you decide what to test next. For example, if we wish to know if all dogs are considered to be animals and we have defined animals as having four legs, we will conclude: 1. Dogs are all forms of life Animals all have four legs. 3. Because of this, all dogs have four legs.

learn more about syllogism here

https://brainly.com/question/21635821

#SPJ4