IDNLearn.com offers a unique blend of expert answers and community insights. Our platform is designed to provide quick and accurate answers to any questions you may have.
Sagot :
We don't have claim to strength of composite B is smaller than the strength of composite B by at least 2 [N].
From the given data we calculate μ₁s₁ and μ₂s₂ mean and standard deviation of samples A and B respectively.
μ₁ = 464.7, s₁ = 13.42 composite A
μ₂ = 479.49, s₂ = 13.38 composite B
n₁ : n₂ < 30 then we will use t-table.
Null hypothesis H₀:μ₂-μ₁ ≥ 2
Alternative hypothesis Hₐ : μ₂ - μ₁ < 2
assuming CI 95%
α = 5% = 0.05
and degree of freedom is n₁ + n₂ - 2 = 9 + 9 - 2 = 16
then for the one tail t(c) = 1.746
now we will compute t(s),
t(s) = (μ₂ - μ₁ - 2)/ sp×√1/n₁ + 1/n₂
sp²= (n₁ - 1) × s₁² + (n₂ - 1) × s₂² / n₁ + n₂ - 2
= 8 × (13.42)² + 8 × (13.38)²/ 16
= (8 × 180.1 + 8 × 179) / 16
sp² = 179.55
sp = 13.40
Therefore
t(s) = (479.49 - 464.7 - 2)/ 13.40 ×√1/9+1/9
= 12.79 / 13.40 × 0.4714
= 12.79 / 6.32
t(s) = 2.02
t(s) > t(c)
t(s) is rejection region.
Therefore we reject H₀
so we don't have evidence to claim to strength pf composite B is smaller than the strength of composite B at least 2 [N].
To know more about deviation here
https://brainly.com/question/17254047
#SPJ4
We appreciate every question and answer you provide. Keep engaging and finding the best solutions. This community is the perfect place to learn and grow together. IDNLearn.com has the solutions to your questions. Thanks for stopping by, and see you next time for more reliable information.
