IDNLearn.com offers a user-friendly platform for finding and sharing knowledge. Get comprehensive and trustworthy answers to all your questions from our knowledgeable community members.

an early attempt by batson and his colleagues (1983) aimed to demonstrate a distinction between empathic and egoistic (here, personal distress) motives for helping a person receiving shocks. identify the true and false statements about the study.

Sagot :

Empathy, rather than egotistic motivation to help, has been suggested to result.

Empathy, rather than egotistic motivation to help, has been suggested to result. Subjects watched another female undergraduate receive electric shocks and then had the opportunity to assist her by administering the remaining shocks themselves to test this hypothesis. In a 2 X 2 design, subjects' level of empathy (low versus high) and their ability to continue to watch the victim suffer if they did not help were manipulated in each of two experiments. We reasoned that if empathy resulted in altruistic motivation, subjects with a high degree of empathy for the victim ought to be equally prepared to assist when attempting to escape without assistance was simple and challenging. However, assuming compassion prompted selfish inspiration, subjects feeling sympathy ought to be more prepared to help when break was troublesome than when it was simple. Supporting the hypothesis that empathy results in altruistic rather than egotistical motivation to help, the results of each experiment followed the former pattern when empathy was high and the latter pattern when empathy was low.

To know more about empathy visit

brainly.com/question/14669414

#SPJ4