IDNLearn.com offers a unique blend of expert answers and community insights. Discover prompt and accurate answers from our experts, ensuring you get the information you need quickly.

47. part a some attorneys are litigators, so some attorneys are skillful litigators, since some attorneys are skillful. which of the following correctly expresses the form of this argument? a. some a are s. b. some a are sl. c. some a are s. some a are l. some a are l. some a are sl. some a are sl. some a are s. some a are l. c. some a are not s. d. some a are l. some a are not l. some a are not s. some a are not sl. some a are sl. part a answer: part b which of the following substitutions proves the argument invalid? this means that the choice below is false. use your answer from part a. a. a

Sagot :

Some A are S; some A are L; so some A are SL correctly expresses the form of the above argument.

The above question is a a situation of syllogism. A syllogism is a type of logical argument that relies on deductive reasoning to draw a conclusion from two assertions or presumptions. A syllogism first appears when a conclusion—the major idea the argument is trying to convey—is validly implied by two genuine premises (propositions or statements). A conclusion is deduced from two or three provided propositions or statements using a syllogism. Aristotelian and Stoic syllogism were two opposing syllogistic philosophies that were prevalent in antiquity. [3] Syllogism and categorical syllogism have been used synonymously since the Middle Ages. Since syllogism is a technique for legitimate logical reasoning, it will always be helpful in the majority of situations and for general-audience introductions to logic and clear thinking.

To know more about syllogism:

https://brainly.com/question/21635821

#SPJ4