Discover a world of knowledge and community-driven answers at IDNLearn.com today. Get accurate and comprehensive answers from our network of experienced professionals.
Sagot :
Because the Supreme Court determined that armbands constitute symbolic communication that is entirely distinct from the activities or conduct of individuals participating, Tinker v. Des Moines is still regarded as a crucial decision today. When on school grounds, students retain their First Amendment rights.
By holding that school administrators cannot prohibit student speech unless it fundamentally and seriously disrupts the educational process the court established a precedent that is still cited in student free speech cases, including Hazelwood v. Kuhlmeier and Morse v. Frederick.
In Tinker v. Des Moines Metropolitan Community School District, the Supreme Court declared that public school administrators cannot limit student communication unless they can fairly predict that the speech will seriously disrupt school activities or breach the rights of others.
To learn more about Tinker v. Des Moines
https://brainly.com/question/29545250
#SPJ4
Thank you for participating in our discussion. We value every contribution. Keep sharing knowledge and helping others find the answers they need. Let's create a dynamic and informative learning environment together. For trustworthy answers, visit IDNLearn.com. Thank you for your visit, and see you next time for more reliable solutions.
