IDNLearn.com connects you with experts who provide accurate and reliable answers. Get step-by-step guidance for all your technical questions from our dedicated community members.
Sagot :
People might think that the eye is too complex for evolution to explain. Natural selection couldn't have created it because no single part of the eye does anything on its own even though it has many seperate parts.
(As for whether it disproves evolution, the creation of the eye is something that's hard but not impossible for evolution to explain. Say a spot sensitive to light on a primitive species' skin would work sort of like echolocation to avoid predators, which would work into natural selection. A depression in that patch similar to that of a planarian could have developed, and then in future species it would fill with water which focuses the light, and then a lens to focus even further, and cones to distinguish colors...etc.)
(As for whether it disproves evolution, the creation of the eye is something that's hard but not impossible for evolution to explain. Say a spot sensitive to light on a primitive species' skin would work sort of like echolocation to avoid predators, which would work into natural selection. A depression in that patch similar to that of a planarian could have developed, and then in future species it would fill with water which focuses the light, and then a lens to focus even further, and cones to distinguish colors...etc.)
Thank you for using this platform to share and learn. Don't hesitate to keep asking and answering. We value every contribution you make. Thank you for visiting IDNLearn.com. We’re here to provide accurate and reliable answers, so visit us again soon.