IDNLearn.com provides a user-friendly platform for finding and sharing knowledge. Find the solutions you need quickly and accurately with help from our knowledgeable community.
Sagot :
People might think that the eye is too complex for evolution to explain. Natural selection couldn't have created it because no single part of the eye does anything on its own even though it has many seperate parts.
(As for whether it disproves evolution, the creation of the eye is something that's hard but not impossible for evolution to explain. Say a spot sensitive to light on a primitive species' skin would work sort of like echolocation to avoid predators, which would work into natural selection. A depression in that patch similar to that of a planarian could have developed, and then in future species it would fill with water which focuses the light, and then a lens to focus even further, and cones to distinguish colors...etc.)
(As for whether it disproves evolution, the creation of the eye is something that's hard but not impossible for evolution to explain. Say a spot sensitive to light on a primitive species' skin would work sort of like echolocation to avoid predators, which would work into natural selection. A depression in that patch similar to that of a planarian could have developed, and then in future species it would fill with water which focuses the light, and then a lens to focus even further, and cones to distinguish colors...etc.)
We value your presence here. Keep sharing knowledge and helping others find the answers they need. This community is the perfect place to learn together. Thanks for visiting IDNLearn.com. We’re dedicated to providing clear answers, so visit us again for more helpful information.