IDNLearn.com provides a seamless experience for finding and sharing answers. Ask your questions and receive comprehensive and trustworthy answers from our experienced community of professionals.
Sagot :
The Gibbons v. Ogden court case in a nutshell:
Ogden had a monopoly on operating steamboats on the Lower Mississippi.
Gibbons, who had a federal liscence to operate steamboats, tried to start business there and was sued by Ogden.
The ruling was that Gibbons would be allowed to operate there, which gave precedent to federal law over state law.
Ogden had a monopoly on operating steamboats on the Lower Mississippi.
Gibbons, who had a federal liscence to operate steamboats, tried to start business there and was sued by Ogden.
The ruling was that Gibbons would be allowed to operate there, which gave precedent to federal law over state law.
Answer: The case set definitions for navigation and placed federal control over all coastal and river trade.
Explanation:
We appreciate your contributions to this forum. Don't forget to check back for the latest answers. Keep asking, answering, and sharing useful information. Thanks for visiting IDNLearn.com. We’re dedicated to providing clear answers, so visit us again for more helpful information.