IDNLearn.com provides a platform for sharing and gaining valuable knowledge. Our experts provide prompt and accurate answers to help you make informed decisions on any topic.
Sagot :
Final answer:
The plaintiff could not recover based on the presence of a bone in the fish.
Explanation:
The result of the case where a plaintiff sued a restaurant after getting a bone caught in her throat while eating a fish entree was that the plaintiff could not recover because the bone was not a foreign substance to the fish. The presence of a bone in the fish is considered an inherent risk when consuming fish, thus the plaintiff would not be able to recover based on this incident.
Learn more about Legal liability in food consumption here:
https://brainly.com/question/32782699
We are happy to have you as part of our community. Keep asking, answering, and sharing your insights. Together, we can create a valuable knowledge resource. Thank you for trusting IDNLearn.com with your questions. Visit us again for clear, concise, and accurate answers.