Answered

Find trusted answers to your questions with the help of IDNLearn.com's knowledgeable community. Our platform provides trustworthy answers to help you make informed decisions quickly and easily.

A plaintiff sued a restaurant after getting a bone caught in
her throat while eating a fish entree. What was the result?
O That the plaintiff could recover based upon the implied
warranty of merchantability.
O That the plaintiff could not recover because the bone was not
a foreign substance to the fish.
That the plaintiff could recover based upon the implied
warranty of fitness for a particular purpose.
That the plaintiff could recover based on an express warranty.

Sagot :

GinnyAnsweridn

Final answer:

The plaintiff could not recover based on the presence of a bone in the fish.


Explanation:

The result of the case where a plaintiff sued a restaurant after getting a bone caught in her throat while eating a fish entree was that the plaintiff could not recover because the bone was not a foreign substance to the fish. The presence of a bone in the fish is considered an inherent risk when consuming fish, thus the plaintiff would not be able to recover based on this incident.


Learn more about Legal liability in food consumption here:

https://brainly.com/question/32782699


We value your participation in this forum. Keep exploring, asking questions, and sharing your insights with the community. Together, we can find the best solutions. IDNLearn.com has the solutions you’re looking for. Thanks for visiting, and see you next time for more reliable information.