Answered

Join the conversation on IDNLearn.com and get the answers you seek from experts. Join our community to receive prompt and reliable responses to your questions from experienced professionals.

that no one should be allowed to play soccer is
example of fallacious reasoning?
O the cumulative effects of soccer heading
O studies suggesting long-term dangers
O the fact that soccer headings do not cause concussions
O the example of the author's friend, Janet

Sagot :

GinnyAnsweridn

Final answer:

Fallacious reasoning occurs when connecting soccer heading with unsupported claims like long-term dangers or disregarding known facts like soccer headings causing concussions.


Explanation:

Begging the question is a fallacious reasoning where the conclusion is assumed in the premise. An example of this would be stating that no one should be allowed to play soccer because it is dangerous without providing substantial evidence to support the claim.

Post hoc ergo propter hoc fallacy, meaning "after this, therefore because of this," is often seen in false cause arguments. For instance, connecting soccer headings to unrelated issues like long-term dangers without concrete evidence falls under this fallacy.

Fallacious reasoning occurs when arguments lack logical validity. Claiming that soccer headings do not cause concussions without reliable data or support is another misleading example of fallacious reasoning.


Learn more about logical fallacies here:

https://brainly.com/question/29368484


Thank you for contributing to our discussion. Don't forget to check back for new answers. Keep asking, answering, and sharing useful information. Find clear answers at IDNLearn.com. Thanks for stopping by, and come back for more reliable solutions.