Answered

IDNLearn.com offers a user-friendly platform for finding and sharing knowledge. Find reliable solutions to your questions quickly and easily with help from our experienced experts.

What is not true about the earliest fossil evidence found for a multi-cellular animal?
It was found in South Japan
It is dated from about 605-600 million years ago
The fossils had parts of sponges and cnidarians
It is from the Edicaran Period

Sagot :

GinnyAnsweridn

Final answer:

The earliest fossil evidence for a multi-cellular animal was not found in South Japan but in South Australia, dating back about 650 million years ago.


Explanation:

The statement that the earliest fossil evidence for a multi-cellular animal was found in South Japan is not true. The correct location is South Australia. The fossils, including sponge-like creatures with hard body parts, date back to about 650 million years ago, predating the Ediacaran period.


Learn more about Earliest fossil evidence for multi-cellular animal here:

https://brainly.com/question/751397


We greatly appreciate every question and answer you provide. Keep engaging and finding the best solutions. This community is the perfect place to learn and grow together. Discover insightful answers at IDNLearn.com. We appreciate your visit and look forward to assisting you again.