IDNLearn.com offers a comprehensive solution for all your question and answer needs. Discover comprehensive answers to your questions from our community of knowledgeable experts.

What is not true about the earliest fossil evidence found for a multi-cellular animal?
It was found in South Japan
It is dated from about 605-600 million years ago
The fossils had parts of sponges and cnidarians
It is from the Edicaran Period


Sagot :

Final answer:

The earliest fossil evidence for a multi-cellular animal was not found in South Japan but in South Australia, dating back about 650 million years ago.


Explanation:

The statement that the earliest fossil evidence for a multi-cellular animal was found in South Japan is not true. The correct location is South Australia. The fossils, including sponge-like creatures with hard body parts, date back to about 650 million years ago, predating the Ediacaran period.


Learn more about Earliest fossil evidence for multi-cellular animal here:

https://brainly.com/question/751397


Thank you for participating in our discussion. We value every contribution. Keep sharing knowledge and helping others find the answers they need. Let's create a dynamic and informative learning environment together. Thanks for visiting IDNLearn.com. We’re dedicated to providing clear answers, so visit us again for more helpful information.