Answered

Get detailed and accurate answers to your questions on IDNLearn.com. Our community is here to provide the comprehensive and accurate answers you need to make informed decisions.

V. Bakke
QUESTION 7
Which of the following court cases did the U.S. Supreme Court rule that extra points for race were allowe
University of Michigan's Law School because there were other items in the process, such as an interview
Gratz v. Bollinger
Grutter v. Bollinger
Regents of the University of California v. Bakke
Friends for School Admissions v. Harvard
Click Save and Submit to save and submit. Click Save All Answers to save all answers.

Sagot :

GinnyAnsweridn

Final answer:

Grutter v. Bollinger (2003) upheld the University of Michigan Law School's affirmative action admissions policy, allowing race as one of several factors in admissions.


Explanation:

Grutter v. Bollinger (2003) was the U.S. Supreme Court case that upheld the University of Michigan Law School's affirmative action admissions policy.

The Court ruled in a 5-4 decision that considering race as one of several factors in admissions was acceptable, while rejecting the use of strict quotas for minority students.

Individualized evaluation of candidates with race as just one criterion is permissible, as ruled in the Grutter case.


Learn more about affirmative action in Higher Education admissions here:

https://brainly.com/question/51135973


We appreciate your contributions to this forum. Don't forget to check back for the latest answers. Keep asking, answering, and sharing useful information. Your search for answers ends at IDNLearn.com. Thank you for visiting, and we hope to assist you again soon.