Answered

At IDNLearn.com, find answers to your most pressing questions from experts and enthusiasts alike. Our Q&A platform offers detailed and trustworthy answers to ensure you have the information you need.

V. Bakke
QUESTION 7
Which of the following court cases did the U.S. Supreme Court rule that extra points for race were allowe
University of Michigan's Law School because there were other items in the process, such as an interview
Gratz v. Bollinger
Grutter v. Bollinger
Regents of the University of California v. Bakke
Friends for School Admissions v. Harvard
Click Save and Submit to save and submit. Click Save All Answers to save all answers.

Sagot :

GinnyAnsweridn

Final answer:

Grutter v. Bollinger (2003) upheld the University of Michigan Law School's affirmative action admissions policy, allowing race as one of several factors in admissions.


Explanation:

Grutter v. Bollinger (2003) was the U.S. Supreme Court case that upheld the University of Michigan Law School's affirmative action admissions policy.

The Court ruled in a 5-4 decision that considering race as one of several factors in admissions was acceptable, while rejecting the use of strict quotas for minority students.

Individualized evaluation of candidates with race as just one criterion is permissible, as ruled in the Grutter case.


Learn more about affirmative action in Higher Education admissions here:

https://brainly.com/question/51135973


Your engagement is important to us. Keep sharing your knowledge and experiences. Let's create a learning environment that is both enjoyable and beneficial. Your questions find clarity at IDNLearn.com. Thanks for stopping by, and come back for more dependable solutions.