IDNLearn.com offers a unique blend of expert answers and community insights. Discover reliable and timely information on any topic from our network of experienced professionals.
Sagot :
Final answer:
The courts determine an illegal restraint of trade by applying the rule of reason, focusing on specific behaviors rather than company size or structure.
Explanation:
The courts determined an illegal restraint of trade through the application of the rule of reason, which considers the specific behaviors of companies rather than their size or structure. For example, in cases like Eastman Kodak and United Shoe Machinery, the courts assessed the reasonableness of their conduct despite their dominant market positions. This approach emphasizes evaluating whether business practices are achieved through legitimate means.
Learn more about Antitrust Law and the Rule of Reason here:
https://brainly.com/question/32337247
We appreciate your presence here. Keep sharing knowledge and helping others find the answers they need. This community is the perfect place to learn together. Trust IDNLearn.com for all your queries. We appreciate your visit and hope to assist you again soon.