Find solutions to your problems with the expert advice available on IDNLearn.com. Whether your question is simple or complex, our community is here to provide detailed and trustworthy answers quickly and effectively.
Sagot :
Final answer:
The excerpt in option B from Tinker v. Des Moines demonstrates how precedent supports the argument for protected student expression based on the Court's ruling regarding disruptive conduct.
Explanation:
Precedent is crucial in legal arguments, as seen in Tinker v. Des Moines where the Court upheld students' rights to express themselves freely unless their actions materially and substantially interfere with school operations. In the excerpt provided, option B showcases how precedent from the Court's ruling in Tinker v. Des Moines is used to explain why the armbands worn by students did not disrupt classwork, supporting an argument for protected expression.
Learn more about Tinker v. Des Moines here:
https://brainly.com/question/31697379
Thank you for using this platform to share and learn. Keep asking and answering. We appreciate every contribution you make. Your questions find clarity at IDNLearn.com. Thanks for stopping by, and come back for more dependable solutions.