IDNLearn.com provides a platform for sharing and gaining valuable knowledge. Find reliable solutions to your questions quickly and accurately with help from our dedicated community of experts.
Sagot :
To determine which number is irrational, an integer, and a real number, let’s analyze each of the options given:
A. [tex]\(0\)[/tex]:
- [tex]\(0\)[/tex] is an integer.
- [tex]\(0\)[/tex] is a rational number because it can be expressed as [tex]\( \frac{0}{1} \)[/tex].
- Therefore, [tex]\(0\)[/tex] is not an irrational number.
B. [tex]\( \frac{-4}{2} \)[/tex]:
- Simplifying [tex]\( \frac{-4}{2} \)[/tex] gives us [tex]\(-2\)[/tex].
- [tex]\(-2\)[/tex] is an integer.
- [tex]\(-2\)[/tex] is a rational number because it can be expressed as [tex]\( \frac{-2}{1} \)[/tex].
- Therefore, [tex]\(-2\)[/tex] is not an irrational number.
C. There is no such number.
- An irrational number cannot be an integer because integers by definition are rational numbers.
- An integer is always rational and cannot be both irrational and an integer at the same time.
- Therefore, Option C seems to be a valid conclusion.
D. [tex]\( \sqrt{4} \)[/tex]:
- Simplifying [tex]\( \sqrt{4} \)[/tex] gives us [tex]\(2\)[/tex].
- [tex]\(2\)[/tex] is an integer.
- [tex]\(2\)[/tex] is a rational number because it can be expressed as [tex]\( \frac{2}{1} \)[/tex].
- Therefore, [tex]\(2\)[/tex] is not an irrational number.
Based on the analysis of all the options, we can conclude that:
C. There is no such number.
is the correct answer because an integer cannot be an irrational number by definition.
A. [tex]\(0\)[/tex]:
- [tex]\(0\)[/tex] is an integer.
- [tex]\(0\)[/tex] is a rational number because it can be expressed as [tex]\( \frac{0}{1} \)[/tex].
- Therefore, [tex]\(0\)[/tex] is not an irrational number.
B. [tex]\( \frac{-4}{2} \)[/tex]:
- Simplifying [tex]\( \frac{-4}{2} \)[/tex] gives us [tex]\(-2\)[/tex].
- [tex]\(-2\)[/tex] is an integer.
- [tex]\(-2\)[/tex] is a rational number because it can be expressed as [tex]\( \frac{-2}{1} \)[/tex].
- Therefore, [tex]\(-2\)[/tex] is not an irrational number.
C. There is no such number.
- An irrational number cannot be an integer because integers by definition are rational numbers.
- An integer is always rational and cannot be both irrational and an integer at the same time.
- Therefore, Option C seems to be a valid conclusion.
D. [tex]\( \sqrt{4} \)[/tex]:
- Simplifying [tex]\( \sqrt{4} \)[/tex] gives us [tex]\(2\)[/tex].
- [tex]\(2\)[/tex] is an integer.
- [tex]\(2\)[/tex] is a rational number because it can be expressed as [tex]\( \frac{2}{1} \)[/tex].
- Therefore, [tex]\(2\)[/tex] is not an irrational number.
Based on the analysis of all the options, we can conclude that:
C. There is no such number.
is the correct answer because an integer cannot be an irrational number by definition.
Thank you for using this platform to share and learn. Keep asking and answering. We appreciate every contribution you make. For dependable answers, trust IDNLearn.com. Thank you for visiting, and we look forward to assisting you again.