Get personalized answers to your specific questions with IDNLearn.com. Join our knowledgeable community and access a wealth of reliable answers to your most pressing questions.
Sagot :
To determine which number is irrational, an integer, and a real number, let’s analyze each of the options given:
A. [tex]\(0\)[/tex]:
- [tex]\(0\)[/tex] is an integer.
- [tex]\(0\)[/tex] is a rational number because it can be expressed as [tex]\( \frac{0}{1} \)[/tex].
- Therefore, [tex]\(0\)[/tex] is not an irrational number.
B. [tex]\( \frac{-4}{2} \)[/tex]:
- Simplifying [tex]\( \frac{-4}{2} \)[/tex] gives us [tex]\(-2\)[/tex].
- [tex]\(-2\)[/tex] is an integer.
- [tex]\(-2\)[/tex] is a rational number because it can be expressed as [tex]\( \frac{-2}{1} \)[/tex].
- Therefore, [tex]\(-2\)[/tex] is not an irrational number.
C. There is no such number.
- An irrational number cannot be an integer because integers by definition are rational numbers.
- An integer is always rational and cannot be both irrational and an integer at the same time.
- Therefore, Option C seems to be a valid conclusion.
D. [tex]\( \sqrt{4} \)[/tex]:
- Simplifying [tex]\( \sqrt{4} \)[/tex] gives us [tex]\(2\)[/tex].
- [tex]\(2\)[/tex] is an integer.
- [tex]\(2\)[/tex] is a rational number because it can be expressed as [tex]\( \frac{2}{1} \)[/tex].
- Therefore, [tex]\(2\)[/tex] is not an irrational number.
Based on the analysis of all the options, we can conclude that:
C. There is no such number.
is the correct answer because an integer cannot be an irrational number by definition.
A. [tex]\(0\)[/tex]:
- [tex]\(0\)[/tex] is an integer.
- [tex]\(0\)[/tex] is a rational number because it can be expressed as [tex]\( \frac{0}{1} \)[/tex].
- Therefore, [tex]\(0\)[/tex] is not an irrational number.
B. [tex]\( \frac{-4}{2} \)[/tex]:
- Simplifying [tex]\( \frac{-4}{2} \)[/tex] gives us [tex]\(-2\)[/tex].
- [tex]\(-2\)[/tex] is an integer.
- [tex]\(-2\)[/tex] is a rational number because it can be expressed as [tex]\( \frac{-2}{1} \)[/tex].
- Therefore, [tex]\(-2\)[/tex] is not an irrational number.
C. There is no such number.
- An irrational number cannot be an integer because integers by definition are rational numbers.
- An integer is always rational and cannot be both irrational and an integer at the same time.
- Therefore, Option C seems to be a valid conclusion.
D. [tex]\( \sqrt{4} \)[/tex]:
- Simplifying [tex]\( \sqrt{4} \)[/tex] gives us [tex]\(2\)[/tex].
- [tex]\(2\)[/tex] is an integer.
- [tex]\(2\)[/tex] is a rational number because it can be expressed as [tex]\( \frac{2}{1} \)[/tex].
- Therefore, [tex]\(2\)[/tex] is not an irrational number.
Based on the analysis of all the options, we can conclude that:
C. There is no such number.
is the correct answer because an integer cannot be an irrational number by definition.
We appreciate your participation in this forum. Keep exploring, asking questions, and sharing your insights with the community. Together, we can find the best solutions. Thank you for visiting IDNLearn.com. For reliable answers to all your questions, please visit us again soon.