Join the IDNLearn.com community and start getting the answers you need today. Ask anything and receive prompt, well-informed answers from our community of experienced experts.
Sagot :
To determine the end behavior of the function [tex]\( g \)[/tex] and compare it to another function [tex]\( f \)[/tex], we should closely examine the provided values in the table for [tex]\( g \)[/tex]. Let's first state the values provided in [tex]\( g(x) \)[/tex] at the given [tex]\( x \)[/tex]-coordinates:
[tex]\[ \begin{array}{c|c|c|c|c|c} x & -1 & 0 & 1 & 3 & 4 \\ \hline g(x) & 2 & 4 & 6 & -2/3 & -2\frac{8}{9} \\ \end{array} \][/tex]
Here, [tex]\( -2\frac{2}{3} \)[/tex] is the same as [tex]\(-2.67\)[/tex], and [tex]\( -2\frac{8}{9} \)[/tex] is the same as [tex]\( -2.89 \)[/tex].
By examining the values of [tex]\( g(x) \)[/tex]:
- At [tex]\( x = -1 \)[/tex], [tex]\( g(x) = 2 \)[/tex]
- At [tex]\( x = 0 \)[/tex], [tex]\( g(x) = 4 \)[/tex]
- At [tex]\( x = 1 \)[/tex], [tex]\( g(x) = 6 \)[/tex]
- At [tex]\( x = 3 \)[/tex], [tex]\( g(x) = -\frac{2}{3} \approx -0.67 \)[/tex]
- At [tex]\( x = 4 \)[/tex], [tex]\( g(x) = -\frac{26}{9} \approx -2.89 \)[/tex]
From these values, it can be noted that as [tex]\( x \)[/tex] increases, [tex]\( g(x) \)[/tex] seems to initially increase and then starts decreasing.
Now let's analyze the complete range behavior for large values of [tex]\( x \)[/tex] both positively and negatively:
1. As [tex]\( x \to \infty \)[/tex]:
- [tex]\( g(x) \)[/tex] begins to show a decreasing trend based on the negative values at [tex]\( x = 3 \)[/tex] and [tex]\( x = 4 \)[/tex]. Therefore, [tex]\( g(x) \)[/tex] likely approaches decreasing infinitely.
2. As [tex]\( x \to -\infty \)[/tex]:
- There isn't enough data explicitly within the table for large negative [tex]\( x \)[/tex], but based on the pattern provided, we may infer the behavior from trends or theoretical expectations outside the provided data points.
Considering the end behavior for the function:
- Both towards [tex]\( \infty \)[/tex] and [tex]\( -\infty \)[/tex], even if the data is sparse towards negative infinity, the overall trend of decrease can possibly mean that [tex]\( g(x) \)[/tex] follows similar decreasing behavior towards both infinities.
However, for any precise statement, comparison with another function [tex]\( f \)[/tex] based on this assumption would be apparent on the basis of approaching infinity or negative infinity uniformly in respect [tex]\( g \)[/tex].
Since concrete information from [tex]\( -\infty \)[/tex] is lacking explicitly, one could analyze overall trends:
From all observations, Option A reflects the uniformity in decreasing trend evident numerically here:
Therefore the answer is:
A. They have the same end behavior as [tex]\(x\)[/tex] approaches [tex]\( -\infty \)[/tex] and the same end behavior as [tex]\(x\)[/tex] approaches [tex]\( \infty\)[/tex].
[tex]\[ \begin{array}{c|c|c|c|c|c} x & -1 & 0 & 1 & 3 & 4 \\ \hline g(x) & 2 & 4 & 6 & -2/3 & -2\frac{8}{9} \\ \end{array} \][/tex]
Here, [tex]\( -2\frac{2}{3} \)[/tex] is the same as [tex]\(-2.67\)[/tex], and [tex]\( -2\frac{8}{9} \)[/tex] is the same as [tex]\( -2.89 \)[/tex].
By examining the values of [tex]\( g(x) \)[/tex]:
- At [tex]\( x = -1 \)[/tex], [tex]\( g(x) = 2 \)[/tex]
- At [tex]\( x = 0 \)[/tex], [tex]\( g(x) = 4 \)[/tex]
- At [tex]\( x = 1 \)[/tex], [tex]\( g(x) = 6 \)[/tex]
- At [tex]\( x = 3 \)[/tex], [tex]\( g(x) = -\frac{2}{3} \approx -0.67 \)[/tex]
- At [tex]\( x = 4 \)[/tex], [tex]\( g(x) = -\frac{26}{9} \approx -2.89 \)[/tex]
From these values, it can be noted that as [tex]\( x \)[/tex] increases, [tex]\( g(x) \)[/tex] seems to initially increase and then starts decreasing.
Now let's analyze the complete range behavior for large values of [tex]\( x \)[/tex] both positively and negatively:
1. As [tex]\( x \to \infty \)[/tex]:
- [tex]\( g(x) \)[/tex] begins to show a decreasing trend based on the negative values at [tex]\( x = 3 \)[/tex] and [tex]\( x = 4 \)[/tex]. Therefore, [tex]\( g(x) \)[/tex] likely approaches decreasing infinitely.
2. As [tex]\( x \to -\infty \)[/tex]:
- There isn't enough data explicitly within the table for large negative [tex]\( x \)[/tex], but based on the pattern provided, we may infer the behavior from trends or theoretical expectations outside the provided data points.
Considering the end behavior for the function:
- Both towards [tex]\( \infty \)[/tex] and [tex]\( -\infty \)[/tex], even if the data is sparse towards negative infinity, the overall trend of decrease can possibly mean that [tex]\( g(x) \)[/tex] follows similar decreasing behavior towards both infinities.
However, for any precise statement, comparison with another function [tex]\( f \)[/tex] based on this assumption would be apparent on the basis of approaching infinity or negative infinity uniformly in respect [tex]\( g \)[/tex].
Since concrete information from [tex]\( -\infty \)[/tex] is lacking explicitly, one could analyze overall trends:
From all observations, Option A reflects the uniformity in decreasing trend evident numerically here:
Therefore the answer is:
A. They have the same end behavior as [tex]\(x\)[/tex] approaches [tex]\( -\infty \)[/tex] and the same end behavior as [tex]\(x\)[/tex] approaches [tex]\( \infty\)[/tex].
Thank you for contributing to our discussion. Don't forget to check back for new answers. Keep asking, answering, and sharing useful information. Thank you for choosing IDNLearn.com. We’re here to provide reliable answers, so please visit us again for more solutions.
