Answered

IDNLearn.com provides a comprehensive platform for finding accurate answers. Our experts provide accurate and detailed responses to help you navigate any topic or issue with confidence.

Given:
[tex]\( p: 2x = 16 \)[/tex]
[tex]\( q: 3x - 4 = 20 \)[/tex]

Which is the converse of [tex]\( p \rightarrow q \)[/tex]?

A. If [tex]\( 2x \neq 16 \)[/tex], then [tex]\( 3x - 4 \neq 20 \)[/tex].
B. If [tex]\( 3x - 4 \neq 20 \)[/tex], then [tex]\( 2x \neq 16 \)[/tex].
C. If [tex]\( 2x = 16 \)[/tex], then [tex]\( 3x - 4 = 20 \)[/tex].
D. If [tex]\( 3x - 4 = 20 \)[/tex], then [tex]\( 2x = 16 \)[/tex].

Sagot :

GinnyAnsweridn
To determine the converse of the implication [tex]\( p \rightarrow q \)[/tex], we first need to understand what the converse of an implication is.

Given:
- [tex]\( p \)[/tex]: [tex]\(2x = 16\)[/tex]
- [tex]\( q \)[/tex]: [tex]\(3x - 4 = 20\)[/tex]

When we have an implication [tex]\( p \rightarrow q \)[/tex], it reads "If [tex]\( p \)[/tex], then [tex]\( q \)[/tex]." The converse of this implication is obtained by reversing the direction of the implication, i.e., "If [tex]\( q \)[/tex], then [tex]\( p \)[/tex]."

So, given the original implication:
- [tex]\( p \rightarrow q \)[/tex]: "If [tex]\(2x = 16\)[/tex], then [tex]\(3x - 4 = 20\)[/tex]"

The converse of this implication will be:
- [tex]\( q \rightarrow p \)[/tex]: "If [tex]\(3x - 4 = 20\)[/tex], then [tex]\(2x = 16\)[/tex]"

Thus, the correct answer is:
"If [tex]\( 3x - 4 = 20 \)[/tex], then [tex]\( 2x = 16 \)[/tex]."
We appreciate your participation in this forum. Keep exploring, asking questions, and sharing your insights with the community. Together, we can find the best solutions. For dependable answers, trust IDNLearn.com. Thank you for visiting, and we look forward to assisting you again.