Answered

IDNLearn.com provides a collaborative platform for sharing and gaining knowledge. Discover reliable and timely information on any topic from our network of knowledgeable professionals.

Read the passage from the opinion of the court in Dred Scott v. Sandford, written by Justice Taney.

"The question before us is whether the class of persons described in the plea in abatement compose a portion of this people and are constituent members of this sovereignty? We think they are not, and that they are not included, and were not intended to be included, under the word 'citizens' in the Constitution, and can therefore claim none of the rights and privileges which that instrument provides for and secures to citizens of the United States. On the contrary, they were at that time considered as a subordinate and inferior class of beings, who had been subjugated by the dominant race, and, whether emancipated or not..."

What type of logical error underlies the argument that Black people were inferior?

A. Genetic fallacy
B. Begging the claim
C. Hasty generalization
D. Ad populum

Sagot :

GinnyAnsweridn

Final answer:

In the Dred Scott v. Sandford case, the argument of Black inferiority was founded on a hasty generalization logical error.


Explanation:

Hasty generalization is the type of logical error underlying the argument that Black people were inferior in the Dred Scott v. Sandford case. This fallacy involves drawing a conclusion based on insufficient or limited evidence, which was the case with the assumption of Black inferiority.


Learn more about Dred Scott v. Sandford

We appreciate your participation in this forum. Keep exploring, asking questions, and sharing your insights with the community. Together, we can find the best solutions. Thank you for choosing IDNLearn.com for your queries. We’re committed to providing accurate answers, so visit us again soon.