Connect with a global community of experts on IDNLearn.com. Get accurate and timely answers to your queries from our extensive network of experienced professionals.

Which shows the best use of the associative and commutative properties to make simplifying [tex]\(\frac{3}{4} - 5 + 9 - \frac{2}{4} + 2\)[/tex] easier?

A. [tex]\(\left[\frac{3}{4} + \left(-\frac{2}{4}\right)\right] + [9 + 2 + (-5)]\)[/tex]

B. [tex]\(\left[2 + \frac{3}{4} + (-5)\right] + \left[\left(-\frac{2}{4}\right) + 9\right]\)[/tex]

C. [tex]\(\left[\frac{3}{4} + 9 + (-5)\right] + \left[2 + \left(-\frac{2}{4}\right)\right]\)[/tex]

D. [tex]\(\left[\frac{3}{4} + (-5)\right] + \left[9 + \left(-\frac{2}{4}\right) + 2\right]\)[/tex]


Sagot :

To simplify the expression [tex]\(\frac{3}{4} - 5 + 9 - \frac{2}{4} + 2\)[/tex] using the associative and commutative properties, we need to strategically rearrange and group the terms to make the computation easier.

Let's examine each option:

Option A: [tex]\(\left[\frac{3}{4}+\left(-\frac{2}{4}\right)\right]+[9+2+(-5)]\)[/tex]

1. Group the fractions: [tex]\(\left[\frac{3}{4} + \left(-\frac{2}{4}\right)\right]\)[/tex]
- This simplifies to [tex]\(\frac{1}{4}\)[/tex].

2. Group the integers: [tex]\([9 + 2 + (-5)]\)[/tex]
- This simplifies to [tex]\(6\)[/tex].

Combining these results, the expression simplifies to [tex]\(\frac{1}{4} + 6\)[/tex], which is easier to compute.

Option B: [tex]\(\left[2+\frac{3}{4}+(-5)\right]+\left[\left(-\frac{2}{4}\right)+9\right]\)[/tex]

1. Group terms inside the first bracket: [tex]\(\left[2 + \frac{3}{4} + (-5)\right]\)[/tex]
- We do have mixed numbers and an integer, which may not be as straightforward to simplify.

2. Group terms inside the second bracket: [tex]\(\left[(-\frac{2}{4}) + 9\right]\)[/tex]
- This suggests subtracting a fraction from an integer, which might be less straightforward than needed.

Option C: [tex]\(\left[\frac{3}{4}+9+(-5)\right]+\left[2+\left(-\frac{2}{4}\right)\right]\)[/tex]

1. Group terms inside the first bracket: [tex]\(\left[\frac{3}{4} + 9 + (-5)\right]\)[/tex]
- This combines a fraction with integers, leading to more steps.

2. Group terms inside the second bracket: [tex]\(\left[2 + (-\frac{2}{4})\right]\)[/tex]
- Again, it combines a fraction and an integer, which complicates the simplification.

Option D: [tex]\(\left[\frac{3}{4}+(-5)\right]+\left[9+\left(-\frac{2}{4}\right)+2\right]\)[/tex]

1. Group terms inside the first bracket: [tex]\(\left[\frac{3}{4} + (-5)\right]\)[/tex]
- This combines a fraction with a negative integer, again leading to more steps.

2. Group terms inside the second bracket: [tex]\(\left[9 + (-\frac{2}{4}) + 2\right]\)[/tex]
- Combining larger integers and fractions could be slightly complex and need more simplification steps.

From these analyses, Option A emerges as the best use of the associative and commutative properties to simplify the expression. It involves straightforward grouping and calculation:

[tex]\[ \left[\frac{3}{4} + \left(-\frac{2}{4}\right)\right] + [9 + 2 + (-5)] = \left[\frac{1}{4}\right] + [6] \][/tex]

This simplifies directly to [tex]\(\frac{1}{4} + 6\)[/tex], making Option A the most efficient and simplest method to simplify the expression.

Therefore, Option A is the correct answer.