Find the best solutions to your problems with the help of IDNLearn.com's expert users. Get step-by-step guidance for all your technical questions from our dedicated community members.
Sagot :
To determine which reflection of the point [tex]\((0, k)\)[/tex] will produce an image at the same coordinates [tex]\((0, k)\)[/tex], let's analyze the effect of reflecting the point across each given axis and line.
1. Reflection across the [tex]\( x \)[/tex]-axis:
- For a point [tex]\((x, y)\)[/tex], reflecting it across the [tex]\( x \)[/tex]-axis results in the point [tex]\((x, -y)\)[/tex].
- For our specific point [tex]\((0, k)\)[/tex], reflecting it across the [tex]\( x \)[/tex]-axis would yield the point [tex]\((0, -k)\)[/tex], which is not the same as the original point unless [tex]\( k = 0 \)[/tex]. Therefore, this option does not generally give us [tex]\((0, k)\)[/tex].
2. Reflection across the [tex]\( y \)[/tex]-axis:
- For a point [tex]\((x, y)\)[/tex], reflecting it across the [tex]\( y \)[/tex]-axis results in the point [tex]\((-x, y)\)[/tex].
- For our specific point [tex]\((0, k)\)[/tex], reflecting it across the [tex]\( y \)[/tex]-axis would yield the point [tex]\((0, k)\)[/tex], which is exactly the same as the original point. Thus, this reflection maintains the coordinates.
3. Reflection across the line [tex]\( y = x \)[/tex]:
- For a point [tex]\((x, y)\)[/tex], reflecting it across the line [tex]\( y = x \)[/tex] results in the point [tex]\((y, x)\)[/tex].
- For our specific point [tex]\((0, k)\)[/tex], reflecting it across the line [tex]\( y = x \)[/tex] would yield the point [tex]\((k, 0)\)[/tex], which is different from the original point unless [tex]\( k = 0 \)[/tex]. Hence, this option does not generally give us [tex]\((0, k)\)[/tex].
4. Reflection across the line [tex]\( y = -x \)[/tex]:
- For a point [tex]\((x, y)\)[/tex], reflecting it across the line [tex]\( y = -x \)[/tex] results in the point [tex]\((-y, -x)\)[/tex].
- For our specific point [tex]\((0, k)\)[/tex], reflecting it across the line [tex]\( y = -x \)[/tex] would yield the point [tex]\((-k, 0)\)[/tex], which is once again different from the original point unless [tex]\( k = 0 \)[/tex]. So, this option also does not generally give us [tex]\((0, k)\)[/tex].
Upon examining all the reflections, the only reflection that results in the point [tex]\((0, k)\)[/tex] remaining unchanged is the reflection across the [tex]\( y \)[/tex]-axis.
Therefore, the correct reflection is across the [tex]\( y \)[/tex]-axis, which corresponds to the second option.
1. Reflection across the [tex]\( x \)[/tex]-axis:
- For a point [tex]\((x, y)\)[/tex], reflecting it across the [tex]\( x \)[/tex]-axis results in the point [tex]\((x, -y)\)[/tex].
- For our specific point [tex]\((0, k)\)[/tex], reflecting it across the [tex]\( x \)[/tex]-axis would yield the point [tex]\((0, -k)\)[/tex], which is not the same as the original point unless [tex]\( k = 0 \)[/tex]. Therefore, this option does not generally give us [tex]\((0, k)\)[/tex].
2. Reflection across the [tex]\( y \)[/tex]-axis:
- For a point [tex]\((x, y)\)[/tex], reflecting it across the [tex]\( y \)[/tex]-axis results in the point [tex]\((-x, y)\)[/tex].
- For our specific point [tex]\((0, k)\)[/tex], reflecting it across the [tex]\( y \)[/tex]-axis would yield the point [tex]\((0, k)\)[/tex], which is exactly the same as the original point. Thus, this reflection maintains the coordinates.
3. Reflection across the line [tex]\( y = x \)[/tex]:
- For a point [tex]\((x, y)\)[/tex], reflecting it across the line [tex]\( y = x \)[/tex] results in the point [tex]\((y, x)\)[/tex].
- For our specific point [tex]\((0, k)\)[/tex], reflecting it across the line [tex]\( y = x \)[/tex] would yield the point [tex]\((k, 0)\)[/tex], which is different from the original point unless [tex]\( k = 0 \)[/tex]. Hence, this option does not generally give us [tex]\((0, k)\)[/tex].
4. Reflection across the line [tex]\( y = -x \)[/tex]:
- For a point [tex]\((x, y)\)[/tex], reflecting it across the line [tex]\( y = -x \)[/tex] results in the point [tex]\((-y, -x)\)[/tex].
- For our specific point [tex]\((0, k)\)[/tex], reflecting it across the line [tex]\( y = -x \)[/tex] would yield the point [tex]\((-k, 0)\)[/tex], which is once again different from the original point unless [tex]\( k = 0 \)[/tex]. So, this option also does not generally give us [tex]\((0, k)\)[/tex].
Upon examining all the reflections, the only reflection that results in the point [tex]\((0, k)\)[/tex] remaining unchanged is the reflection across the [tex]\( y \)[/tex]-axis.
Therefore, the correct reflection is across the [tex]\( y \)[/tex]-axis, which corresponds to the second option.
We appreciate your contributions to this forum. Don't forget to check back for the latest answers. Keep asking, answering, and sharing useful information. Thank you for trusting IDNLearn.com with your questions. Visit us again for clear, concise, and accurate answers.