IDNLearn.com provides a user-friendly platform for finding answers to your questions. Find the answers you need quickly and accurately with help from our knowledgeable and experienced experts.

Ming wrote the table of points below.

[tex]\[
\begin{tabular}{|c|c|}
\hline
$x$ & $y$ \\
\hline
5 & 10 \\
\hline
10 & 20 \\
\hline
15 & 30 \\
\hline
\end{tabular}
\][/tex]

Which explains whether or not Ming has described a proportional relationship, and why?

A. Ming has described a proportional relationship because the ordered pairs are linear and the line passes through the origin.
B. Ming has not described a proportional relationship. Although it is a linear relationship, it does not pass through the origin.
C. Ming has not described a proportional relationship. Although it passes through the origin, it is not a linear relationship.
D. Ming has described a proportional relationship because the line does not pass through the origin.


Sagot :

Let's determine if Ming has described a proportional relationship by examining the given points in the table.

Firstly, let's list down the given points:

- (5, 10)
- (10, 20)
- (15, 30)

A relationship is considered proportional if the change in [tex]\( y \)[/tex] is consistently a multiple of the change in [tex]\( x \)[/tex], and the line passes through the origin (0,0), essentially meaning [tex]\( y = kx \)[/tex] for some constant [tex]\( k \)[/tex].

1. Checking for Linear Relationship:
- For the point (5, 10): If [tex]\( k \)[/tex] is constant, then [tex]\( y = kx \)[/tex]. Here, [tex]\( 10 = k \cdot 5 \)[/tex], solving this gives [tex]\( k = 2 \)[/tex].
- For the point (10, 20): Here, [tex]\( 20 = k \cdot 10 \)[/tex], solving this gives [tex]\( k = 2 \)[/tex].
- For the point (15, 30): Here, [tex]\( 30 = k \cdot 15 \)[/tex], solving this gives [tex]\( k = 2 \)[/tex].

Since [tex]\( k \)[/tex] is consistently 2 for all points, the relationship is linear, expressed as [tex]\( y = 2x \)[/tex].

2. Checking for Proportional Relationship:
- A proportional relationship must pass through the origin (0,0), meaning when [tex]\( x = 0 \)[/tex], [tex]\( y \)[/tex] should also be 0, adhering to the form [tex]\( y = kx \)[/tex].

Here, the relationship [tex]\( y = 2x \)[/tex] would pass through the origin (since when [tex]\( x = 0 \)[/tex], then [tex]\( y = 2 \cdot 0 = 0 \)[/tex]).

Since the line formed by the points (5, 10), (10, 20), and (15, 30) is both linear and passes through the origin, Ming has, indeed, described a proportional relationship.

Therefore, the correct explanation is:
Ming has described a proportional relationship because the ordered pairs are linear and the line passes through the origin.