IDNLearn.com provides a user-friendly platform for finding answers to your questions. Find the answers you need quickly and accurately with help from our knowledgeable and experienced experts.
Sagot :
Let's determine if Ming has described a proportional relationship by examining the given points in the table.
Firstly, let's list down the given points:
- (5, 10)
- (10, 20)
- (15, 30)
A relationship is considered proportional if the change in [tex]\( y \)[/tex] is consistently a multiple of the change in [tex]\( x \)[/tex], and the line passes through the origin (0,0), essentially meaning [tex]\( y = kx \)[/tex] for some constant [tex]\( k \)[/tex].
1. Checking for Linear Relationship:
- For the point (5, 10): If [tex]\( k \)[/tex] is constant, then [tex]\( y = kx \)[/tex]. Here, [tex]\( 10 = k \cdot 5 \)[/tex], solving this gives [tex]\( k = 2 \)[/tex].
- For the point (10, 20): Here, [tex]\( 20 = k \cdot 10 \)[/tex], solving this gives [tex]\( k = 2 \)[/tex].
- For the point (15, 30): Here, [tex]\( 30 = k \cdot 15 \)[/tex], solving this gives [tex]\( k = 2 \)[/tex].
Since [tex]\( k \)[/tex] is consistently 2 for all points, the relationship is linear, expressed as [tex]\( y = 2x \)[/tex].
2. Checking for Proportional Relationship:
- A proportional relationship must pass through the origin (0,0), meaning when [tex]\( x = 0 \)[/tex], [tex]\( y \)[/tex] should also be 0, adhering to the form [tex]\( y = kx \)[/tex].
Here, the relationship [tex]\( y = 2x \)[/tex] would pass through the origin (since when [tex]\( x = 0 \)[/tex], then [tex]\( y = 2 \cdot 0 = 0 \)[/tex]).
Since the line formed by the points (5, 10), (10, 20), and (15, 30) is both linear and passes through the origin, Ming has, indeed, described a proportional relationship.
Therefore, the correct explanation is:
Ming has described a proportional relationship because the ordered pairs are linear and the line passes through the origin.
Firstly, let's list down the given points:
- (5, 10)
- (10, 20)
- (15, 30)
A relationship is considered proportional if the change in [tex]\( y \)[/tex] is consistently a multiple of the change in [tex]\( x \)[/tex], and the line passes through the origin (0,0), essentially meaning [tex]\( y = kx \)[/tex] for some constant [tex]\( k \)[/tex].
1. Checking for Linear Relationship:
- For the point (5, 10): If [tex]\( k \)[/tex] is constant, then [tex]\( y = kx \)[/tex]. Here, [tex]\( 10 = k \cdot 5 \)[/tex], solving this gives [tex]\( k = 2 \)[/tex].
- For the point (10, 20): Here, [tex]\( 20 = k \cdot 10 \)[/tex], solving this gives [tex]\( k = 2 \)[/tex].
- For the point (15, 30): Here, [tex]\( 30 = k \cdot 15 \)[/tex], solving this gives [tex]\( k = 2 \)[/tex].
Since [tex]\( k \)[/tex] is consistently 2 for all points, the relationship is linear, expressed as [tex]\( y = 2x \)[/tex].
2. Checking for Proportional Relationship:
- A proportional relationship must pass through the origin (0,0), meaning when [tex]\( x = 0 \)[/tex], [tex]\( y \)[/tex] should also be 0, adhering to the form [tex]\( y = kx \)[/tex].
Here, the relationship [tex]\( y = 2x \)[/tex] would pass through the origin (since when [tex]\( x = 0 \)[/tex], then [tex]\( y = 2 \cdot 0 = 0 \)[/tex]).
Since the line formed by the points (5, 10), (10, 20), and (15, 30) is both linear and passes through the origin, Ming has, indeed, described a proportional relationship.
Therefore, the correct explanation is:
Ming has described a proportional relationship because the ordered pairs are linear and the line passes through the origin.
We appreciate your presence here. Keep sharing knowledge and helping others find the answers they need. This community is the perfect place to learn together. IDNLearn.com is your go-to source for dependable answers. Thank you for visiting, and we hope to assist you again.