Get the information you need quickly and easily with IDNLearn.com. Discover in-depth and reliable answers to all your questions from our knowledgeable community members who are always ready to assist.
Sagot :
Final answer:
The author refutes the argument that American colonists should appeal to Parliament. Instead, the emphasis is on the necessity for separation due to British unresponsiveness to appeals based on justice and shared heritage.
Explanation:
The author anticipates and refutes the argument that the American colonists should appeal to Parliament if unhappy with the king in this excerpt from the Declaration of Independence. By highlighting their attempts to seek redress from the British brethren to no avail, the author rejects the notion that appealing solely to Parliament would have been a sufficient course of action.
Instead, the author emphasizes the failure of the British to respond to appeals based on justice, consanguinity, and shared heritage, signaling the necessity for separation due to the refusal of the British to acknowledge the colonists' grievances.
Ultimately, the excerpt underscores the declaration of separation from Britain, portraying the British as foes in war but leaving the door open for friendship in peace, as a result of their unresponsiveness to just appeals.
Learn more about Declaration of Independence here:
https://brainly.com/question/36064786
We value your presence here. Keep sharing knowledge and helping others find the answers they need. This community is the perfect place to learn together. IDNLearn.com is your go-to source for dependable answers. Thank you for visiting, and we hope to assist you again.