IDNLearn.com makes it easy to find accurate answers to your questions. Ask anything and get well-informed, reliable answers from our knowledgeable community members.
Sagot :
To answer this question, we need to determine which rotation transformations could have moved the point [tex]\((3, -2)\)[/tex] to the point [tex]\((2, 3)\)[/tex]. We will analyze the effects of rotating the point by 90°, 180°, 270°, -90°, and -270°.
### Rotation by 90° Clockwise ([tex]\(R_{0,90^{\circ}}\)[/tex])
The rule for rotating a point [tex]\((x, y)\)[/tex] by 90° clockwise around the origin is:
[tex]\[ (x, y) \rightarrow (-y, x) \][/tex]
Applying this transformation to the point [tex]\((3, -2)\)[/tex]:
[tex]\[ (3, -2) \rightarrow (-(-2), 3) \][/tex]
[tex]\[ (3, -2) \rightarrow (2, 3) \][/tex]
Thus, rotation by [tex]\(90^\circ\)[/tex] clockwise does result in the point [tex]\((2, 3)\)[/tex].
### Rotation by 180° ([tex]\(R_{0,180^{\circ}}\)[/tex])
The rule for rotating a point [tex]\((x, y)\)[/tex] by 180° around the origin is:
[tex]\[ (x, y) \rightarrow (-x, -y) \][/tex]
Applying this transformation to the point [tex]\((3, -2)\)[/tex]:
[tex]\[ (3, -2) \rightarrow (-3, 2) \][/tex]
Thus, rotation by [tex]\(180^\circ\)[/tex] does not result in the point [tex]\((2, 3)\)[/tex].
### Rotation by 270° Clockwise ([tex]\(R_{0,270^{\circ}}\)[/tex])
The rule for rotating a point [tex]\((x, y)\)[/tex] by 270° clockwise (or equivalently 90° counterclockwise) around the origin is:
[tex]\[ (x, y) \rightarrow (y, -x) \][/tex]
Applying this transformation to the point [tex]\((3, -2)\)[/tex]:
[tex]\[ (3, -2) \rightarrow (-2, -3) \][/tex]
Thus, rotation by [tex]\(270^\circ\)[/tex] clockwise does not result in the point [tex]\((2, 3)\)[/tex].
### Rotation by 90° Counterclockwise ([tex]\(R_{0,-90^{\circ}}\)[/tex])
The rule for rotating a point [tex]\((x, y)\)[/tex] by 90° counterclockwise around the origin is:
[tex]\[ (x, y) \rightarrow (y, -x) \][/tex]
Applying this transformation to the point [tex]\((3, -2)\)[/tex]:
[tex]\[ (3, -2) \rightarrow (-2, -3) \][/tex]
Thus, rotation by [tex]\(90^\circ\)[/tex] counterclockwise does not result in the point [tex]\((2, 3)\)[/tex].
### Rotation by 270° Counterclockwise ([tex]\(R_{0,-270^{\circ}}\)[/tex])
Rotation by [tex]\(270^\circ\)[/tex] counterclockwise is the same as rotating by [tex]\(90^\circ\)[/tex] clockwise:
[tex]\[ (x, y) \rightarrow (-y, x) \][/tex]
Applying this transformation to the point [tex]\((3, -2)\)[/tex]:
[tex]\[ (3, -2) \rightarrow (2, 3) \][/tex]
Thus, rotation by [tex]\(270^\circ\)[/tex] counterclockwise results in the point [tex]\((2, 3)\)[/tex].
Therefore, the transformations that could have taken place are:
1. [tex]\(R_{0,90^\circ}\)[/tex]
2. [tex]\(R_{0,-270^\circ}\)[/tex]
Thus, the correct answer is:
[tex]\[R_{0,90^{\circ}}\][/tex]
[tex]\[R_{0,-270^{\circ}}\][/tex]
### Rotation by 90° Clockwise ([tex]\(R_{0,90^{\circ}}\)[/tex])
The rule for rotating a point [tex]\((x, y)\)[/tex] by 90° clockwise around the origin is:
[tex]\[ (x, y) \rightarrow (-y, x) \][/tex]
Applying this transformation to the point [tex]\((3, -2)\)[/tex]:
[tex]\[ (3, -2) \rightarrow (-(-2), 3) \][/tex]
[tex]\[ (3, -2) \rightarrow (2, 3) \][/tex]
Thus, rotation by [tex]\(90^\circ\)[/tex] clockwise does result in the point [tex]\((2, 3)\)[/tex].
### Rotation by 180° ([tex]\(R_{0,180^{\circ}}\)[/tex])
The rule for rotating a point [tex]\((x, y)\)[/tex] by 180° around the origin is:
[tex]\[ (x, y) \rightarrow (-x, -y) \][/tex]
Applying this transformation to the point [tex]\((3, -2)\)[/tex]:
[tex]\[ (3, -2) \rightarrow (-3, 2) \][/tex]
Thus, rotation by [tex]\(180^\circ\)[/tex] does not result in the point [tex]\((2, 3)\)[/tex].
### Rotation by 270° Clockwise ([tex]\(R_{0,270^{\circ}}\)[/tex])
The rule for rotating a point [tex]\((x, y)\)[/tex] by 270° clockwise (or equivalently 90° counterclockwise) around the origin is:
[tex]\[ (x, y) \rightarrow (y, -x) \][/tex]
Applying this transformation to the point [tex]\((3, -2)\)[/tex]:
[tex]\[ (3, -2) \rightarrow (-2, -3) \][/tex]
Thus, rotation by [tex]\(270^\circ\)[/tex] clockwise does not result in the point [tex]\((2, 3)\)[/tex].
### Rotation by 90° Counterclockwise ([tex]\(R_{0,-90^{\circ}}\)[/tex])
The rule for rotating a point [tex]\((x, y)\)[/tex] by 90° counterclockwise around the origin is:
[tex]\[ (x, y) \rightarrow (y, -x) \][/tex]
Applying this transformation to the point [tex]\((3, -2)\)[/tex]:
[tex]\[ (3, -2) \rightarrow (-2, -3) \][/tex]
Thus, rotation by [tex]\(90^\circ\)[/tex] counterclockwise does not result in the point [tex]\((2, 3)\)[/tex].
### Rotation by 270° Counterclockwise ([tex]\(R_{0,-270^{\circ}}\)[/tex])
Rotation by [tex]\(270^\circ\)[/tex] counterclockwise is the same as rotating by [tex]\(90^\circ\)[/tex] clockwise:
[tex]\[ (x, y) \rightarrow (-y, x) \][/tex]
Applying this transformation to the point [tex]\((3, -2)\)[/tex]:
[tex]\[ (3, -2) \rightarrow (2, 3) \][/tex]
Thus, rotation by [tex]\(270^\circ\)[/tex] counterclockwise results in the point [tex]\((2, 3)\)[/tex].
Therefore, the transformations that could have taken place are:
1. [tex]\(R_{0,90^\circ}\)[/tex]
2. [tex]\(R_{0,-270^\circ}\)[/tex]
Thus, the correct answer is:
[tex]\[R_{0,90^{\circ}}\][/tex]
[tex]\[R_{0,-270^{\circ}}\][/tex]
Thank you for using this platform to share and learn. Don't hesitate to keep asking and answering. We value every contribution you make. Find precise solutions at IDNLearn.com. Thank you for trusting us with your queries, and we hope to see you again.