IDNLearn.com offers a comprehensive platform for finding and sharing knowledge. Get prompt and accurate answers to your questions from our community of experts who are always ready to help.

Eve's teacher asked her to graph the function [tex]\( y = -\cot(x) - 1 \)[/tex] by reflecting the graph of the function [tex]\( y = \cot(x) \)[/tex] about the [tex]\( x \)[/tex]-axis and translating it vertically. Does it matter in which order Eve does the transformations?

A. Yes, it matters. The graph of the function [tex]\( y = \cot(x) \)[/tex] should be reflected about the [tex]\( x \)[/tex]-axis before it is translated 1 unit down.
B. Yes, it matters. The graph of the function [tex]\( y = \cot(x) \)[/tex] should be reflected about the [tex]\( x \)[/tex]-axis before it is translated 1 unit up.
C. No, it doesn't matter. Reflecting the graph of the function [tex]\( y = \cot(x) \)[/tex] about the [tex]\( x \)[/tex]-axis and translating the graph 1 unit down in either order will produce the correct graph.
D. No, it doesn't matter. Reflecting the graph of the function [tex]\( y = \cot(x) \)[/tex] about the [tex]\( x \)[/tex]-axis and translating the graph 1 unit up in either order will produce the correct graph.


Sagot :

To determine if the order of transformations matters when graphing the function [tex]\( y = -\cot(x) - 1 \)[/tex], let's go through the steps in detail.

### Step-by-Step Analysis

1. Original Function Analysis:
The original function given is [tex]\( y = \cot(x) \)[/tex].

2. Transformation Details:
We need to reflect this graph about the [tex]\( x \)[/tex]-axis and then translate it 1 unit down. We will analyze both possible orders of doing these operations.

#### Case 1: Reflecting First, Then Translating

1. Reflecting about the [tex]\( x \)[/tex]-axis:
Reflecting [tex]\( y = \cot(x) \)[/tex] about the [tex]\( x \)[/tex]-axis changes the function to:
[tex]\[ y = -\cot(x) \][/tex]

2. Translating 1 Unit Down:
After reflecting, we translate the resulting graph 1 unit down by subtracting 1 from it:
[tex]\[ y = -\cot(x) - 1 \][/tex]

This gives us the desired function [tex]\( y = -\cot(x) - 1 \)[/tex].

#### Case 2: Translating First, Then Reflecting

1. Translating 1 Unit Down:
Translating [tex]\( y = \cot(x) \)[/tex] 1 unit down:
[tex]\[ y = \cot(x) - 1 \][/tex]

2. Reflecting about the [tex]\( x \)[/tex]-axis:
Reflecting the new function [tex]\( y = \cot(x) - 1 \)[/tex] about the [tex]\( x \)[/tex]-axis changes the function to:
[tex]\[ y = - (\cot(x) - 1) = -\cot(x) + 1 \][/tex]

In this case, we end up with the function [tex]\( y = -\cot(x) + 1 \)[/tex], which is not the same as [tex]\( y = -\cot(x) - 1 \)[/tex].

### Conclusion
Through the analysis, we see that:
- Reflecting about the [tex]\( x \)[/tex]-axis first and then translating 1 unit down produces [tex]\( y = -\cot(x) - 1 \)[/tex].
- Translating 1 unit down first and then reflecting about the [tex]\( x \)[/tex]-axis produces [tex]\( y = -\cot(x) + 1 \)[/tex].

Since these two final functions are not equivalent, the order of transformations does matter.

### Correct Conclusion
Therefore, Eve should reflect the graph of the function [tex]\( y = \cot(x) \)[/tex] about the [tex]\( x \)[/tex]-axis before it is translated 1 unit down.

The correct answer is:
Yes, it matters. The graph of the function [tex]\( y = \cot(x) \)[/tex] should be reflected about the [tex]\( x \)[/tex]-axis before it is translated 1 unit down.