Experience the convenience of getting your questions answered at IDNLearn.com. Explore a wide array of topics and find reliable answers from our experienced community members.

How does synthesis differ from argumentation?

A. Synthesis involves presenting one-sided viewpoints, while argumentation involves presenting a balanced perspective with equal attention to opposing viewpoints.
B. Synthesis involves combining multiple sources to create a new perspective, while argumentation involves supporting a specific perspective with evidence.
C. Synthesis involves presenting a counterargument, while argumentation involves ignoring opposing viewpoints.
D. Synthesis involves summarizing sources without analysis, while argumentation involves analyzing sources in-depth.


Sagot :

Final answer:

Synthesis combines multiple sources to form new perspectives, while argumentation supports a specific viewpoint with evidence.


Explanation:

Synthesis involves combining multiple sources to create a new perspective, while argumentation involves supporting a specific perspective with evidence. Synthesis requires drawing from various sources to form a holistic viewpoint, while argumentation focuses on defending a particular stance with supporting data and reasoning. Through synthesis, new ideas are generated by comparing and blending information, whereas argumentation centers on presenting and reinforcing a specific viewpoint.


Learn more about Difference between synthesis and argumentation here:

https://brainly.com/question/39714133


We appreciate every question and answer you provide. Keep engaging and finding the best solutions. This community is the perfect place to learn and grow together. Thank you for trusting IDNLearn.com with your questions. Visit us again for clear, concise, and accurate answers.