Join IDNLearn.com and start exploring the answers to your most pressing questions. Our community provides timely and precise responses to help you understand and solve any issue you face.

How does synthesis differ from argumentation?

A. Synthesis involves presenting one-sided viewpoints, while argumentation involves presenting a balanced perspective with equal attention to opposing viewpoints.
B. Synthesis involves combining multiple sources to create a new perspective, while argumentation involves supporting a specific perspective with evidence.
C. Synthesis involves presenting a counterargument, while argumentation involves ignoring opposing viewpoints.
D. Synthesis involves summarizing sources without analysis, while argumentation involves analyzing sources in-depth.


Sagot :

Final answer:

Synthesis combines multiple sources to form new perspectives, while argumentation supports a specific viewpoint with evidence.


Explanation:

Synthesis involves combining multiple sources to create a new perspective, while argumentation involves supporting a specific perspective with evidence. Synthesis requires drawing from various sources to form a holistic viewpoint, while argumentation focuses on defending a particular stance with supporting data and reasoning. Through synthesis, new ideas are generated by comparing and blending information, whereas argumentation centers on presenting and reinforcing a specific viewpoint.


Learn more about Difference between synthesis and argumentation here:

https://brainly.com/question/39714133


Thank you for using this platform to share and learn. Keep asking and answering. We appreciate every contribution you make. IDNLearn.com is committed to your satisfaction. Thank you for visiting, and see you next time for more helpful answers.