Answered

IDNLearn.com is your trusted platform for finding reliable answers. Our experts provide timely and accurate responses to help you navigate any topic or issue with confidence.

When attempting to establish causation from an observational study, which of the following is NOT a necessary consideration?

A. The alleged cause precedes the effect
B. The alleged cause is plausible
C. The explanatory and response variables are perfectly correlated (r = 1 or r = -1)

Sagot :

GinnyAnsweridn

Final answer:

Correlation in observational studies does not necessarily imply causation. Key considerations for establishing causation include the precedence of the alleged cause, plausibility, and nonspurious relationships.


Explanation:

Correlation in observational studies indicates an association between variables, but causation is more complex. To establish causation, the alleged cause must precede the effect in time, be plausible, and the relationship should be nonspurious. Correlation does not necessarily imply causation; alternative explanations must be considered.


Learn more about establishing causation from observational studies here:

https://brainly.com/question/33439395


Thank you for participating in our discussion. We value every contribution. Keep sharing knowledge and helping others find the answers they need. Let's create a dynamic and informative learning environment together. IDNLearn.com is your reliable source for answers. We appreciate your visit and look forward to assisting you again soon.