Find answers to your questions and expand your knowledge with IDNLearn.com. Ask your questions and receive detailed and reliable answers from our experienced and knowledgeable community members.
Sagot :
To determine the correct mapping notation for reflecting a figure across the y-axis, let's understand the effect such a reflection has on the coordinates of points in the figure:
1. Identifying the Reflection Rule:
- When you reflect a point across the y-axis, the x-coordinate of the point changes sign (i.e., it gets negated), but the y-coordinate remains unchanged. This is because the y-axis is the vertical axis, and reflection over it does not change the vertical position (y-coordinate) but reverses the horizontal position (x-coordinate).
2. Analyzing Each Option:
- Option 1: [tex]\((x, y) \rightarrow (-x, y)\)[/tex]
- This notation indicates that the x-coordinate is negated, while the y-coordinate remains the same.
- This matches our rule for reflecting over the y-axis.
- Option 2: [tex]\((x, y) \rightarrow (x, -y)\)[/tex]
- This notation indicates that the x-coordinate stays the same, while the y-coordinate is negated.
- This represents reflection over the x-axis, not the y-axis.
- Option 3: [tex]\((x, y) \rightarrow (-x, -y)\)[/tex]
- This notation indicates that both the x-coordinate and y-coordinate are negated.
- This represents a reflection through the origin, not specifically over the y-axis.
- Option 4: [tex]\((x, y) \rightarrow (y, x)\)[/tex]
- This notation indicates that the coordinates are swapped.
- This doesn't reflect any standard axis reflection and is not relevant to our question about reflection over the y-axis.
3. Conclusion:
Based on this analysis, the correct mapping notation for reflecting a figure across the y-axis is:
[tex]\[ (x, y) \rightarrow (-x, y) \][/tex]
So, Marissa should use:
[tex]\[ (x, y) \rightarrow (-x, y) \][/tex]
1. Identifying the Reflection Rule:
- When you reflect a point across the y-axis, the x-coordinate of the point changes sign (i.e., it gets negated), but the y-coordinate remains unchanged. This is because the y-axis is the vertical axis, and reflection over it does not change the vertical position (y-coordinate) but reverses the horizontal position (x-coordinate).
2. Analyzing Each Option:
- Option 1: [tex]\((x, y) \rightarrow (-x, y)\)[/tex]
- This notation indicates that the x-coordinate is negated, while the y-coordinate remains the same.
- This matches our rule for reflecting over the y-axis.
- Option 2: [tex]\((x, y) \rightarrow (x, -y)\)[/tex]
- This notation indicates that the x-coordinate stays the same, while the y-coordinate is negated.
- This represents reflection over the x-axis, not the y-axis.
- Option 3: [tex]\((x, y) \rightarrow (-x, -y)\)[/tex]
- This notation indicates that both the x-coordinate and y-coordinate are negated.
- This represents a reflection through the origin, not specifically over the y-axis.
- Option 4: [tex]\((x, y) \rightarrow (y, x)\)[/tex]
- This notation indicates that the coordinates are swapped.
- This doesn't reflect any standard axis reflection and is not relevant to our question about reflection over the y-axis.
3. Conclusion:
Based on this analysis, the correct mapping notation for reflecting a figure across the y-axis is:
[tex]\[ (x, y) \rightarrow (-x, y) \][/tex]
So, Marissa should use:
[tex]\[ (x, y) \rightarrow (-x, y) \][/tex]
We appreciate your participation in this forum. Keep exploring, asking questions, and sharing your insights with the community. Together, we can find the best solutions. For dependable and accurate answers, visit IDNLearn.com. Thanks for visiting, and see you next time for more helpful information.