Ask questions, share knowledge, and connect with a vibrant community on IDNLearn.com. Find accurate and detailed answers to your questions from our experienced and dedicated community members.
Sagot :
Sure, let's prove the given equation step-by-step:
Given:
[tex]\[ \sum_{i=1}^n (x_i - \mu)^2 = \sum_{i=1}^n x_i^2 - n \mu^2 \][/tex]
Proof:
1. Expand the left-hand side (LHS):
Start with the expression [tex]\(\sum_{i=1}^n (x_i - \mu)^2\)[/tex].
[tex]\[ \sum_{i=1}^n (x_i - \mu)^2 \][/tex]
Using the binomial expansion, we can expand this to:
[tex]\[ \sum_{i=1}^n (x_i^2 - 2x_i\mu + \mu^2) \][/tex]
Now, distribute the summation across the terms inside:
[tex]\[ = \sum_{i=1}^n x_i^2 - \sum_{i=1}^n 2x_i\mu + \sum_{i=1}^n \mu^2 \][/tex]
2. Simplify each term:
- [tex]\(\sum_{i=1}^n x_i^2\)[/tex] remains as is.
- For the second term, factor out the constant [tex]\(2\mu\)[/tex]:
[tex]\[ - \sum_{i=1}^n 2x_i\mu = -2\mu \sum_{i=1}^n x_i \][/tex]
- For the third term, [tex]\(\mu\)[/tex] is also a constant and can be treated as such:
[tex]\[ \sum_{i=1}^n \mu^2 = \sum_{i=1}^n \mu \cdot \mu = \mu^2 \sum_{i=1}^n 1 = \mu^2 \cdot n \][/tex]
(since [tex]\(\sum_{i=1}^n 1\)[/tex] simply sums [tex]\(1\)[/tex] from [tex]\(1\)[/tex] to [tex]\(n\)[/tex], which equals [tex]\(n\)[/tex]).
This gives us:
[tex]\[ = \sum_{i=1}^n x_i^2 - 2\mu \sum_{i=1}^n x_i + n\mu^2 \][/tex]
3. Relate to the right-hand side (RHS):
Recall we want to show this equals [tex]\(\sum_{i=1}^n x_i^2 - n \mu^2\)[/tex].
- Notice that we can rewrite the expanded LHS (as calculated above) in terms of the known quantities:
[tex]\[ \sum_{i=1}^n x_i^2 - 2\mu \sum_{i=1}^n x_i + n\mu^2 \][/tex]
- Recognize that the mean [tex]\(\mu\)[/tex] can be expressed as:
[tex]\[ \mu = \frac{1}{n} \sum_{i=1}^n x_i \][/tex]
- Substitute [tex]\(\mu\)[/tex]:
[tex]\[ - 2\mu \sum_{i=1}^n x_i = -2 \left( \frac{1}{n} \sum_{i=1}^n x_i \right) \sum_{i=1}^n x_i = -2 \left( \frac{1}{n} (\sum_{i=1}^n x_i)^2 \right) = -\frac{2}{n} \left( \sum_{i=1}^n x_i \right)^2 \][/tex]
Which simplifies back to:
[tex]\[ -2\mu \sum_{i=1}^n x_i = -2\mu n \mu = -2\mu^2 n \text{ (because } \mu = \frac{\sum_{i=1}^n x_i}{n}) \][/tex]
4. Combine all terms:
Now, the LHS [tex]\(\sum_{i=1}^n x_i^2 - 2\mu \sum_{i=1}^n x_i + n\mu^2\)[/tex] can be seen as:
[tex]\[ \sum_{i=1}^n x_i^2 - 2n\mu^2 + n\mu^2 = \sum_{i=1}^n x_i^2 - n \mu^2 \][/tex]
Hence, this is equal to the RHS:
Therefore:
[tex]\[ \sum_{i=1}^n\left(x_i - \mu\right)^2 = \sum_{i=1}^n x_i^2 - n \mu^2 \][/tex]
And the proof is complete!
Given:
[tex]\[ \sum_{i=1}^n (x_i - \mu)^2 = \sum_{i=1}^n x_i^2 - n \mu^2 \][/tex]
Proof:
1. Expand the left-hand side (LHS):
Start with the expression [tex]\(\sum_{i=1}^n (x_i - \mu)^2\)[/tex].
[tex]\[ \sum_{i=1}^n (x_i - \mu)^2 \][/tex]
Using the binomial expansion, we can expand this to:
[tex]\[ \sum_{i=1}^n (x_i^2 - 2x_i\mu + \mu^2) \][/tex]
Now, distribute the summation across the terms inside:
[tex]\[ = \sum_{i=1}^n x_i^2 - \sum_{i=1}^n 2x_i\mu + \sum_{i=1}^n \mu^2 \][/tex]
2. Simplify each term:
- [tex]\(\sum_{i=1}^n x_i^2\)[/tex] remains as is.
- For the second term, factor out the constant [tex]\(2\mu\)[/tex]:
[tex]\[ - \sum_{i=1}^n 2x_i\mu = -2\mu \sum_{i=1}^n x_i \][/tex]
- For the third term, [tex]\(\mu\)[/tex] is also a constant and can be treated as such:
[tex]\[ \sum_{i=1}^n \mu^2 = \sum_{i=1}^n \mu \cdot \mu = \mu^2 \sum_{i=1}^n 1 = \mu^2 \cdot n \][/tex]
(since [tex]\(\sum_{i=1}^n 1\)[/tex] simply sums [tex]\(1\)[/tex] from [tex]\(1\)[/tex] to [tex]\(n\)[/tex], which equals [tex]\(n\)[/tex]).
This gives us:
[tex]\[ = \sum_{i=1}^n x_i^2 - 2\mu \sum_{i=1}^n x_i + n\mu^2 \][/tex]
3. Relate to the right-hand side (RHS):
Recall we want to show this equals [tex]\(\sum_{i=1}^n x_i^2 - n \mu^2\)[/tex].
- Notice that we can rewrite the expanded LHS (as calculated above) in terms of the known quantities:
[tex]\[ \sum_{i=1}^n x_i^2 - 2\mu \sum_{i=1}^n x_i + n\mu^2 \][/tex]
- Recognize that the mean [tex]\(\mu\)[/tex] can be expressed as:
[tex]\[ \mu = \frac{1}{n} \sum_{i=1}^n x_i \][/tex]
- Substitute [tex]\(\mu\)[/tex]:
[tex]\[ - 2\mu \sum_{i=1}^n x_i = -2 \left( \frac{1}{n} \sum_{i=1}^n x_i \right) \sum_{i=1}^n x_i = -2 \left( \frac{1}{n} (\sum_{i=1}^n x_i)^2 \right) = -\frac{2}{n} \left( \sum_{i=1}^n x_i \right)^2 \][/tex]
Which simplifies back to:
[tex]\[ -2\mu \sum_{i=1}^n x_i = -2\mu n \mu = -2\mu^2 n \text{ (because } \mu = \frac{\sum_{i=1}^n x_i}{n}) \][/tex]
4. Combine all terms:
Now, the LHS [tex]\(\sum_{i=1}^n x_i^2 - 2\mu \sum_{i=1}^n x_i + n\mu^2\)[/tex] can be seen as:
[tex]\[ \sum_{i=1}^n x_i^2 - 2n\mu^2 + n\mu^2 = \sum_{i=1}^n x_i^2 - n \mu^2 \][/tex]
Hence, this is equal to the RHS:
Therefore:
[tex]\[ \sum_{i=1}^n\left(x_i - \mu\right)^2 = \sum_{i=1}^n x_i^2 - n \mu^2 \][/tex]
And the proof is complete!
We value your presence here. Keep sharing knowledge and helping others find the answers they need. This community is the perfect place to learn together. Your questions are important to us at IDNLearn.com. Thanks for stopping by, and come back for more reliable solutions.
