Answered

Join IDNLearn.com and start getting the answers you've been searching for. Our experts provide prompt and accurate answers to help you make informed decisions on any topic.

Why are settlements in places with regular natural disasters controversial?

A. They refuse national rescue services when disasters strike.
B. Insurance costs tend to be lower in these areas.
C. Homes are priced at much higher rates in these areas.
D. Rebuilding is expensive and affects all individuals who pay taxes.

Sagot :

GinnyAnsweridn

Final answer:

Settlements in disaster-prone areas are controversial due to financial impacts, disparities in recovery efforts, and challenges in incentivizing residents to live in safer zones.


Explanation:

Settlements in places with regular natural disasters are controversial due to various factors such as increased risk, financial impacts, inequalities, and social injustice. For instance, low-income households are often uninsured and struggle to recover financially from disasters, leading to disparities in recovery efforts. Moreover, the tension between creating disincentives for living in high-risk zones and supporting existing residents poses challenges in disaster-prone areas.


Learn more about natural disasters and settlements here:

https://brainly.com/question/9619156


We appreciate your participation in this forum. Keep exploring, asking questions, and sharing your insights with the community. Together, we can find the best solutions. IDNLearn.com has the solutions to your questions. Thanks for stopping by, and come back for more insightful information.