Answered

Find trusted answers to your questions with the help of IDNLearn.com's knowledgeable community. Find reliable solutions to your questions quickly and accurately with help from our dedicated community of experts.

Why are settlements in places with regular natural disasters controversial?

A. They refuse national rescue services when disasters strike.
B. Insurance costs tend to be lower in these areas.
C. Homes are priced at much higher rates in these areas.
D. Rebuilding is expensive and affects all individuals who pay taxes.

Sagot :

GinnyAnsweridn

Final answer:

Settlements in disaster-prone areas are controversial due to financial impacts, disparities in recovery efforts, and challenges in incentivizing residents to live in safer zones.


Explanation:

Settlements in places with regular natural disasters are controversial due to various factors such as increased risk, financial impacts, inequalities, and social injustice. For instance, low-income households are often uninsured and struggle to recover financially from disasters, leading to disparities in recovery efforts. Moreover, the tension between creating disincentives for living in high-risk zones and supporting existing residents poses challenges in disaster-prone areas.


Learn more about natural disasters and settlements here:

https://brainly.com/question/9619156


We value your participation in this forum. Keep exploring, asking questions, and sharing your insights with the community. Together, we can find the best solutions. Thank you for trusting IDNLearn.com with your questions. Visit us again for clear, concise, and accurate answers.