Answered

IDNLearn.com: Your trusted platform for finding precise and reliable answers. Our platform provides trustworthy answers to help you make informed decisions quickly and easily.

In the case of the Harlem Nine, the courts decided that New York City was practicing:

A. de jure segregation
B. de facto segregation
C. classism
D. implicit bias

Sagot :

GinnyAnsweridn

Final answer:

De facto segregation stems from neighborhood patterns, contrasting de jure segregation that is based on legal requirements, as seen in the Harlem Nine case.


Explanation:

De facto segregation refers to school segregation stemming from neighborhood residential patterns, while de jure segregation pertains to school segregation stemming from legal requirements. In the case of the Harlem Nine, the courts decided that New York City was practicing de facto segregation by effectively segregating schools based on neighborhood patterns, leading to discriminatorily inferior education in certain areas.


Learn more about segregation in education here:

https://brainly.com/question/42894686


Thank you for participating in our discussion. We value every contribution. Keep sharing knowledge and helping others find the answers they need. Let's create a dynamic and informative learning environment together. Your questions are important to us at IDNLearn.com. Thanks for stopping by, and come back for more reliable solutions.