Connect with experts and get insightful answers to your questions on IDNLearn.com. Our Q&A platform offers reliable and thorough answers to help you make informed decisions quickly and easily.
Sagot :
To determine which sets of quantum numbers describe valid orbitals, we need to verify if each set satisfies the rules for quantum numbers:
1. Principal quantum number (n): This must be a positive integer.
2. Angular momentum quantum number (l): This must be an integer within the range [tex]\(0 \leq l < n\)[/tex].
3. Magnetic quantum number (m): This must be an integer within the range [tex]\(-l \leq m \leq l\)[/tex].
Let's evaluate each set based on these rules:
1. [tex]\(n=1, l=0, m=0\)[/tex]
- [tex]\(n = 1\)[/tex]: principal quantum number, valid (positive integer)
- [tex]\(l = 0\)[/tex]: valid since [tex]\(0 \leq l < n\)[/tex] (here [tex]\(0 \leq 0 < 1\)[/tex])
- [tex]\(m = 0\)[/tex]: valid since [tex]\(-l \leq m \leq l\)[/tex] (here [tex]\(-0 \leq 0 \leq 0\)[/tex])
- This set is valid.
2. [tex]\(n=2, l=1, m=3\)[/tex]
- [tex]\(n = 2\)[/tex]: principal quantum number, valid (positive integer)
- [tex]\(l = 1\)[/tex]: valid since [tex]\(0 \leq l < n\)[/tex] (here [tex]\(0 \leq 1 < 2\)[/tex])
- [tex]\(m = 3\)[/tex]: invalid since [tex]\(-l \leq m \leq l\)[/tex] (here [tex]\(-1 \leq 3 \leq 1\)[/tex] does not hold)
- This set is not valid.
3. [tex]\(n=2, l=2, m=2\)[/tex]
- [tex]\(n = 2\)[/tex]: principal quantum number, valid (positive integer)
- [tex]\(l = 2\)[/tex]: invalid since [tex]\(0 \leq l < n\)[/tex] (here [tex]\(0 \leq 2 < 2\)[/tex] does not hold)
- [tex]\(m = 2\)[/tex]: is conditional on [tex]\(l\)[/tex] being valid which it is not
- This set is not valid.
4. [tex]\(n=3, l=0, m=0\)[/tex]
- [tex]\(n = 3\)[/tex]: principal quantum number, valid (positive integer)
- [tex]\(l = 0\)[/tex]: valid since [tex]\(0 \leq l < n\)[/tex] (here [tex]\(0 \leq 0 < 3\)[/tex])
- [tex]\(m = 0\)[/tex]: valid since [tex]\(-l \leq m \leq l\)[/tex] (here [tex]\(-0 \leq 0 \leq 0\)[/tex])
- This set is valid.
5. [tex]\(n=5, l=4, m=-3\)[/tex]
- [tex]\(n = 5\)[/tex]: principal quantum number, valid (positive integer)
- [tex]\(l = 4\)[/tex]: valid since [tex]\(0 \leq l < n\)[/tex] (here [tex]\(0 \leq 4 < 5\)[/tex])
- [tex]\(m = -3\)[/tex]: valid since [tex]\(-l \leq m \leq l\)[/tex] (here [tex]\(-4 \leq -3 \leq 4\)[/tex])
- This set is valid.
6. [tex]\(n=4, l=-2, m=2\)[/tex]
- [tex]\(n = 4\)[/tex]: principal quantum number, valid (positive integer)
- [tex]\(l = -2\)[/tex]: invalid since [tex]\(l\)[/tex] must be a non-negative integer within [tex]\(0 \leq l < n\)[/tex]
- [tex]\(m = 2\)[/tex]: is conditional on [tex]\(l\)[/tex] being valid which it is not
- This set is not valid.
Therefore, the valid sets of quantum numbers are:
[tex]\[ (1, 0, 0), (3, 0, 0), (5, 4, -3) \][/tex]
1. Principal quantum number (n): This must be a positive integer.
2. Angular momentum quantum number (l): This must be an integer within the range [tex]\(0 \leq l < n\)[/tex].
3. Magnetic quantum number (m): This must be an integer within the range [tex]\(-l \leq m \leq l\)[/tex].
Let's evaluate each set based on these rules:
1. [tex]\(n=1, l=0, m=0\)[/tex]
- [tex]\(n = 1\)[/tex]: principal quantum number, valid (positive integer)
- [tex]\(l = 0\)[/tex]: valid since [tex]\(0 \leq l < n\)[/tex] (here [tex]\(0 \leq 0 < 1\)[/tex])
- [tex]\(m = 0\)[/tex]: valid since [tex]\(-l \leq m \leq l\)[/tex] (here [tex]\(-0 \leq 0 \leq 0\)[/tex])
- This set is valid.
2. [tex]\(n=2, l=1, m=3\)[/tex]
- [tex]\(n = 2\)[/tex]: principal quantum number, valid (positive integer)
- [tex]\(l = 1\)[/tex]: valid since [tex]\(0 \leq l < n\)[/tex] (here [tex]\(0 \leq 1 < 2\)[/tex])
- [tex]\(m = 3\)[/tex]: invalid since [tex]\(-l \leq m \leq l\)[/tex] (here [tex]\(-1 \leq 3 \leq 1\)[/tex] does not hold)
- This set is not valid.
3. [tex]\(n=2, l=2, m=2\)[/tex]
- [tex]\(n = 2\)[/tex]: principal quantum number, valid (positive integer)
- [tex]\(l = 2\)[/tex]: invalid since [tex]\(0 \leq l < n\)[/tex] (here [tex]\(0 \leq 2 < 2\)[/tex] does not hold)
- [tex]\(m = 2\)[/tex]: is conditional on [tex]\(l\)[/tex] being valid which it is not
- This set is not valid.
4. [tex]\(n=3, l=0, m=0\)[/tex]
- [tex]\(n = 3\)[/tex]: principal quantum number, valid (positive integer)
- [tex]\(l = 0\)[/tex]: valid since [tex]\(0 \leq l < n\)[/tex] (here [tex]\(0 \leq 0 < 3\)[/tex])
- [tex]\(m = 0\)[/tex]: valid since [tex]\(-l \leq m \leq l\)[/tex] (here [tex]\(-0 \leq 0 \leq 0\)[/tex])
- This set is valid.
5. [tex]\(n=5, l=4, m=-3\)[/tex]
- [tex]\(n = 5\)[/tex]: principal quantum number, valid (positive integer)
- [tex]\(l = 4\)[/tex]: valid since [tex]\(0 \leq l < n\)[/tex] (here [tex]\(0 \leq 4 < 5\)[/tex])
- [tex]\(m = -3\)[/tex]: valid since [tex]\(-l \leq m \leq l\)[/tex] (here [tex]\(-4 \leq -3 \leq 4\)[/tex])
- This set is valid.
6. [tex]\(n=4, l=-2, m=2\)[/tex]
- [tex]\(n = 4\)[/tex]: principal quantum number, valid (positive integer)
- [tex]\(l = -2\)[/tex]: invalid since [tex]\(l\)[/tex] must be a non-negative integer within [tex]\(0 \leq l < n\)[/tex]
- [tex]\(m = 2\)[/tex]: is conditional on [tex]\(l\)[/tex] being valid which it is not
- This set is not valid.
Therefore, the valid sets of quantum numbers are:
[tex]\[ (1, 0, 0), (3, 0, 0), (5, 4, -3) \][/tex]
Thank you for joining our conversation. Don't hesitate to return anytime to find answers to your questions. Let's continue sharing knowledge and experiences! Find clear and concise answers at IDNLearn.com. Thanks for stopping by, and come back for more dependable solutions.
