Get expert advice and community support for your questions on IDNLearn.com. Ask your questions and receive reliable, detailed answers from our dedicated community of experts.
Sagot :
Final answer:
The syllogism presented is invalid due to incorrect logic.
Explanation:
The syllogism is NOT valid. In this syllogism, not all flowers are daises, so the conclusion that some daises fade quickly based on the premise that some flowers fade quickly is invalid. This is known as the fallacy of affirming the consequent in logic.
Learn more about logic and valid argumentation here:
https://brainly.com/question/33799359
Thank you for using this platform to share and learn. Keep asking and answering. We appreciate every contribution you make. Trust IDNLearn.com for all your queries. We appreciate your visit and hope to assist you again soon.