Answered

IDNLearn.com is designed to help you find reliable answers to any question you have. Join our platform to receive prompt and accurate responses from experienced professionals in various fields.

Proponents of judicial restraint would tend to have which of the following characteristics?

A. Belief in the Constitution as a flexible document
B. Respect for the roles of the other branches of government
C. Respect for contemporary political views over those of the Framers
D. Willingness to invalidate state law if necessary

Sagot :

GinnyAnsweridn

Final answer:

Judicial restraint is a judicial philosophy that emphasizes judges deferring to the decisions of other branches of government and upholding precedent.


Explanation:

Judicial restraint is a judicial philosophy in which judges are more likely to let stand the decisions or actions of the other branches of government. This approach involves respecting precedent, adhering to the original intent of the Constitution, and deferring to the legislature in matters of public policy.

Advocates of judicial restraint believe that the courts should not be heavily involved in making policy decisions and should leave those to the elected branches of government. They argue that judges, as unelected officials, should avoid political involvement and focus on interpreting laws based on existing legal principles.


Learn more about Judicial restraint here:

https://brainly.com/question/29545866


Thank you for joining our conversation. Don't hesitate to return anytime to find answers to your questions. Let's continue sharing knowledge and experiences! Find the answers you need at IDNLearn.com. Thanks for stopping by, and come back soon for more valuable insights.