Join the IDNLearn.com community and start getting the answers you need today. Ask anything and receive well-informed answers from our community of experienced professionals.
Sagot :
To determine which equation can be used to find any corresponding length [tex]\(l\)[/tex] and width [tex]\(w\)[/tex] that fit the pattern in the given table, we need to analyze the relationship between [tex]\(l\)[/tex] and [tex]\(w\)[/tex].
The table provides the following data pairs for width ([tex]\(w\)[/tex]) and length ([tex]\(l\)[/tex]):
[tex]\[ \begin{array}{|c|c|} \hline \text{Width} \, (w) & \text{Length} \, (l) \\ \hline 2 & 37.5 \\ \hline 4 & 18.75 \\ \hline 6 & 12.5 \\ \hline 8 & 9.375 \\ \hline \end{array} \][/tex]
We hypothesize that the relationship between [tex]\(w\)[/tex] and [tex]\(l\)[/tex] follows the equation [tex]\(l = \frac{k}{w}\)[/tex], where [tex]\(k\)[/tex] is a constant.
To verify this, we need to calculate the product [tex]\(l \cdot w\)[/tex] for each pair of values provided in the table and check if the product remains constant.
[tex]\[ \begin{align*} (2, 37.5) &: 2 \cdot 37.5 = 75.0 \\ (4, 18.75) &: 4 \cdot 18.75 = 75.0 \\ (6, 12.5) &: 6 \cdot 12.5 = 75.0 \\ (8, 9.375) &: 8 \cdot 9.375 = 75.0 \\ \end{align*} \][/tex]
Since the product [tex]\(l \cdot w\)[/tex] is 75.0 for each pair, it confirms that [tex]\(k = 75.0\)[/tex]. This means the relationship between the width [tex]\(w\)[/tex] and the length [tex]\(l\)[/tex] is indeed described by the equation [tex]\(l = \frac{k}{w}\)[/tex], with [tex]\(k = 75.0\)[/tex].
Thus, the correct equation to represent the relationship between the width and the length of the rectangle, given the data in the table, is:
[tex]\[ l = \frac{75.0}{w} \][/tex]
Therefore, the equation [tex]\(l = \frac{k}{w}\)[/tex] fits the pattern in the table, where [tex]\(k = 75.0\)[/tex].
The table provides the following data pairs for width ([tex]\(w\)[/tex]) and length ([tex]\(l\)[/tex]):
[tex]\[ \begin{array}{|c|c|} \hline \text{Width} \, (w) & \text{Length} \, (l) \\ \hline 2 & 37.5 \\ \hline 4 & 18.75 \\ \hline 6 & 12.5 \\ \hline 8 & 9.375 \\ \hline \end{array} \][/tex]
We hypothesize that the relationship between [tex]\(w\)[/tex] and [tex]\(l\)[/tex] follows the equation [tex]\(l = \frac{k}{w}\)[/tex], where [tex]\(k\)[/tex] is a constant.
To verify this, we need to calculate the product [tex]\(l \cdot w\)[/tex] for each pair of values provided in the table and check if the product remains constant.
[tex]\[ \begin{align*} (2, 37.5) &: 2 \cdot 37.5 = 75.0 \\ (4, 18.75) &: 4 \cdot 18.75 = 75.0 \\ (6, 12.5) &: 6 \cdot 12.5 = 75.0 \\ (8, 9.375) &: 8 \cdot 9.375 = 75.0 \\ \end{align*} \][/tex]
Since the product [tex]\(l \cdot w\)[/tex] is 75.0 for each pair, it confirms that [tex]\(k = 75.0\)[/tex]. This means the relationship between the width [tex]\(w\)[/tex] and the length [tex]\(l\)[/tex] is indeed described by the equation [tex]\(l = \frac{k}{w}\)[/tex], with [tex]\(k = 75.0\)[/tex].
Thus, the correct equation to represent the relationship between the width and the length of the rectangle, given the data in the table, is:
[tex]\[ l = \frac{75.0}{w} \][/tex]
Therefore, the equation [tex]\(l = \frac{k}{w}\)[/tex] fits the pattern in the table, where [tex]\(k = 75.0\)[/tex].
We value your presence here. Keep sharing knowledge and helping others find the answers they need. This community is the perfect place to learn together. IDNLearn.com has the solutions you’re looking for. Thanks for visiting, and see you next time for more reliable information.