Answered

Get the best answers to your questions with the help of IDNLearn.com's experts. Ask your questions and get detailed, reliable answers from our community of knowledgeable experts.

Which statement best evaluates the effectiveness of the evidence used to support the claim that cruelty is a necessary part of leadership?

A. The evidence effectively demonstrates that cruelty is sometimes necessary to maintain order and authority.
B. The evidence is insufficient and does not convincingly show that cruelty is necessary for leadership.
C. The evidence is well-chosen and illustrates historical examples where cruelty led to successful leadership.
D. The evidence is biased and fails to consider alternative leadership strategies that do not involve cruelty.

Sagot :

GinnyAnsweridn

Final answer:

Evaluation of evidence supporting the claim that cruelty is a necessary part of leadership based on psychological studies and historical examples.


Explanation:

The evidence used to support the claim that cruelty is a necessary part of leadership can be evaluated based on various psychological studies and historical examples. For instance, the Stanford Prison Experiment and the BBC prison study provide insights into how power dynamics can lead to cruelty in leadership roles. Additionally, historical examples show how leaders throughout history have used cruelty to maintain power, emphasizing the connection between power and exploitation.


Learn more about Cruelty in leadership here:

https://brainly.com/question/45023094


We value your participation in this forum. Keep exploring, asking questions, and sharing your insights with the community. Together, we can find the best solutions. Thank you for choosing IDNLearn.com for your queries. We’re here to provide accurate answers, so visit us again soon.