Discover new perspectives and gain insights with IDNLearn.com. Ask any question and receive accurate, in-depth responses from our dedicated team of experts.
Sagot :
Final answer:
The author anticipates and refutes arguments regarding appealing to Parliament, sympathy from British Parliament members, and adequate representation in the British Parliament in the Declaration of Independence excerpt.
Explanation:
The argument the author anticipates and refutes in this excerpt from the Declaration of Independence is:
- OA. If the American colonists are unhappy with the king, they should appeal to Parliament. This argument is refuted by the fact that despite numerous warnings and appeals to their British brethren, they were met with deaf ears, leading to the necessity of separation.
- OB. Most British Parliament members sympathize with the plight of the American colonies. This is refuted by the author's assertion that the British brethren have not heeded their appeals and warnings.
- OC. The American colonies are well represented in the British Parliament and have no right to blame the king. This is refuted by highlighting the lack of representation and acknowledgment of grievances by the British brethren.
Learn more about Declaration of Independence argument refutation here:
https://brainly.com/question/41827961
We appreciate your presence here. Keep sharing knowledge and helping others find the answers they need. This community is the perfect place to learn together. Discover insightful answers at IDNLearn.com. We appreciate your visit and look forward to assisting you again.