Answered

IDNLearn.com: Where questions are met with accurate and insightful answers. Get timely and accurate answers to your questions from our dedicated community of experts who are here to help you.

1. Thomas Hobbes had a viewpoint that human beings are nasty and brutish. John Locke's writing indicates he had a more favorable view of human nature. Who do you agree with? Why?

2. Would you kill a random person for one billion dollars if there was no way you could get caught? What does your answer tell you about human nature?

3. At the end of

(Note: The third question appears to be incomplete and should be reviewed for clarity or completion.)

Sagot :

GinnyAnsweridn

Final answer:

Hobbes and Locke disagreed on human nature; Hobbes saw it as self-interested and chaotic, while Locke viewed it as rational and rights-driven.


Explanation:

Thomas Hobbes and John Locke held contrasting views on human nature.

Hobbes believed humans were inherently self-interested and needed a strong central authority to prevent chaos. He depicted life in the state of nature as harsh and violent, where individuals would compete for survival.

On the other hand, Locke saw humans as inherently rational and believed in natural rights like life, liberty, and property. He proposed a social contract to protect these rights and ensure societal order.


Learn more about philosophy of human nature here:

https://brainly.com/question/41493651


Thank you for contributing to our discussion. Don't forget to check back for new answers. Keep asking, answering, and sharing useful information. IDNLearn.com is your source for precise answers. Thank you for visiting, and we look forward to helping you again soon.