Connect with knowledgeable individuals and get your questions answered on IDNLearn.com. Get the information you need from our community of experts who provide accurate and comprehensive answers to all your questions.
Sagot :
Sure, let's start with part (a) and then move on to part (b).
### Part (a): Expressing the Half-Life \( \lambda \) in Terms of \( k \)
The half-life \( \lambda \) is defined as the time it takes for the amount of the substance to decrease to half of its initial amount \( y_0 \). The decay of the substance follows the equation:
[tex]\[ y = y_0 e^{-kt} \][/tex]
1. By definition, when \( t = \lambda \), the amount \( y \) is half of \( y_0 \), so:
[tex]\[ y = \frac{y_0}{2} \][/tex]
2. Substituting \( y \) and \( t = \lambda \) into the decay equation:
[tex]\[ \frac{y_0}{2} = y_0 e^{-k \lambda} \][/tex]
3. Divide both sides by \( y_0 \) to simplify:
[tex]\[ \frac{1}{2} = e^{-k \lambda} \][/tex]
4. Take the natural logarithm on both sides to solve for \( \lambda \):
[tex]\[ \ln\left(\frac{1}{2}\right) = \ln\left(e^{-k \lambda}\right) \][/tex]
[tex]\[ \ln\left(\frac{1}{2}\right) = -k \lambda \][/tex]
5. Simplify \( \ln\left(\frac{1}{2}\right) \):
[tex]\[ \ln\left(\frac{1}{2}\right) = \ln(1) - \ln(2) = 0 - \ln(2) = -\ln(2) \][/tex]
6. Substitute and solve for \( \lambda \):
[tex]\[ -\ln(2) = -k \lambda \][/tex]
[tex]\[ \lambda = \frac{\ln(2)}{k} \][/tex]
Thus, the half-life \( \lambda \) in terms of \( k \) is:
[tex]\[ \lambda = \frac{\ln(2)}{k} \][/tex]
### Part (b): Verifying the Amount at Time \( t_1 + \lambda \)
Now, we need to verify that the amount at time \( t_1 + \lambda \) is half of the amount at time \( t_1 \).
1. Suppose at time \( t_1 \), the amount is \( y_1 \). Then:
[tex]\[ y_1 = y_0 e^{-k t_1} \][/tex]
2. We want to find the amount \( y \) at time \( t = t_1 + \lambda \):
[tex]\[ y = y_0 e^{-k (t_1 + \lambda)} \][/tex]
3. Substitute \( \lambda = \frac{\ln(2)}{k} \):
[tex]\[ y = y_0 e^{-k \left(t_1 + \frac{\ln(2)}{k}\right)} \][/tex]
4. Simplify the exponent:
[tex]\[ y = y_0 e^{-k t_1} e^{-k \frac{\ln(2)}{k}} \][/tex]
[tex]\[ y = y_0 e^{-k t_1} e^{-\ln(2)} \][/tex]
5. Since \( e^{-\ln(2)} = \frac{1}{e^{\ln(2)}} = \frac{1}{2} \):
[tex]\[ y = y_0 e^{-k t_1} \cdot \frac{1}{2} \][/tex]
[tex]\[ y = \frac{1}{2} y_0 e^{-k t_1} \][/tex]
6. Recall that \( y_0 e^{-k t_1} = y_1 \):
[tex]\[ y = \frac{1}{2} y_1 \][/tex]
Therefore, at time \( t_1 + \lambda \), the amount will be half of the amount at time \( t_1 \):
[tex]\[ y = \frac{y_1}{2} \][/tex]
This confirms that the amount at time [tex]\( t_1 + \lambda \)[/tex] is indeed [tex]\( \frac{y_1}{2} \)[/tex], no matter what [tex]\( t_1 \)[/tex] is.
### Part (a): Expressing the Half-Life \( \lambda \) in Terms of \( k \)
The half-life \( \lambda \) is defined as the time it takes for the amount of the substance to decrease to half of its initial amount \( y_0 \). The decay of the substance follows the equation:
[tex]\[ y = y_0 e^{-kt} \][/tex]
1. By definition, when \( t = \lambda \), the amount \( y \) is half of \( y_0 \), so:
[tex]\[ y = \frac{y_0}{2} \][/tex]
2. Substituting \( y \) and \( t = \lambda \) into the decay equation:
[tex]\[ \frac{y_0}{2} = y_0 e^{-k \lambda} \][/tex]
3. Divide both sides by \( y_0 \) to simplify:
[tex]\[ \frac{1}{2} = e^{-k \lambda} \][/tex]
4. Take the natural logarithm on both sides to solve for \( \lambda \):
[tex]\[ \ln\left(\frac{1}{2}\right) = \ln\left(e^{-k \lambda}\right) \][/tex]
[tex]\[ \ln\left(\frac{1}{2}\right) = -k \lambda \][/tex]
5. Simplify \( \ln\left(\frac{1}{2}\right) \):
[tex]\[ \ln\left(\frac{1}{2}\right) = \ln(1) - \ln(2) = 0 - \ln(2) = -\ln(2) \][/tex]
6. Substitute and solve for \( \lambda \):
[tex]\[ -\ln(2) = -k \lambda \][/tex]
[tex]\[ \lambda = \frac{\ln(2)}{k} \][/tex]
Thus, the half-life \( \lambda \) in terms of \( k \) is:
[tex]\[ \lambda = \frac{\ln(2)}{k} \][/tex]
### Part (b): Verifying the Amount at Time \( t_1 + \lambda \)
Now, we need to verify that the amount at time \( t_1 + \lambda \) is half of the amount at time \( t_1 \).
1. Suppose at time \( t_1 \), the amount is \( y_1 \). Then:
[tex]\[ y_1 = y_0 e^{-k t_1} \][/tex]
2. We want to find the amount \( y \) at time \( t = t_1 + \lambda \):
[tex]\[ y = y_0 e^{-k (t_1 + \lambda)} \][/tex]
3. Substitute \( \lambda = \frac{\ln(2)}{k} \):
[tex]\[ y = y_0 e^{-k \left(t_1 + \frac{\ln(2)}{k}\right)} \][/tex]
4. Simplify the exponent:
[tex]\[ y = y_0 e^{-k t_1} e^{-k \frac{\ln(2)}{k}} \][/tex]
[tex]\[ y = y_0 e^{-k t_1} e^{-\ln(2)} \][/tex]
5. Since \( e^{-\ln(2)} = \frac{1}{e^{\ln(2)}} = \frac{1}{2} \):
[tex]\[ y = y_0 e^{-k t_1} \cdot \frac{1}{2} \][/tex]
[tex]\[ y = \frac{1}{2} y_0 e^{-k t_1} \][/tex]
6. Recall that \( y_0 e^{-k t_1} = y_1 \):
[tex]\[ y = \frac{1}{2} y_1 \][/tex]
Therefore, at time \( t_1 + \lambda \), the amount will be half of the amount at time \( t_1 \):
[tex]\[ y = \frac{y_1}{2} \][/tex]
This confirms that the amount at time [tex]\( t_1 + \lambda \)[/tex] is indeed [tex]\( \frac{y_1}{2} \)[/tex], no matter what [tex]\( t_1 \)[/tex] is.
We value your presence here. Keep sharing knowledge and helping others find the answers they need. This community is the perfect place to learn together. IDNLearn.com has the solutions to your questions. Thanks for stopping by, and come back for more insightful information.
