Answered

IDNLearn.com connects you with a community of knowledgeable individuals ready to help. Discover reliable and timely information on any topic from our network of experienced professionals.

Which case held that an encounter would be deemed consensual if a reasonable person in the suspect's position would feel free to decline the officers' requests or otherwise terminate the encounter?

A. People v. Cartwright
B. US v. Drayton
C. Florida v. Bostick (1991)

Sagot :

GinnyAnsweridn

Final answer:

In legal contexts, consensual encounters with law enforcement are defined by the suspect's ability to end the interaction, exemplified by the Florida v. Bostick case and guidelines set in Terry v. Ohio.


Explanation:

Consensual encounters with law enforcement are characterized by the notion that a reasonable person in the suspect's position would feel free to decline officers' requests or end the encounter.

In Florida v. Bostick (1991), the Supreme Court held that if a person feels free to terminate the encounter with police, it can be deemed consensual, even if in a police-citizen interaction.

Similarly, Terry v. Ohio (1968) established guidelines for police stops based on reasonable suspicion, offering insight into lawful encounters between individuals and law enforcement.


Learn more about Legal Consent and Police Encounters here:

https://brainly.com/question/33903563


Your participation is crucial to us. Keep sharing your knowledge and experiences. Let's create a learning environment that is both enjoyable and beneficial. Thank you for choosing IDNLearn.com. We’re here to provide reliable answers, so please visit us again for more solutions.