Connect with experts and get insightful answers on IDNLearn.com. Get accurate and detailed answers to your questions from our dedicated community members who are always ready to help.

Which term describes the idea that the Supreme Court can take a vigorous or active approach when reviewing the actions of other governmental branches?

A. Judicial activism
B. Judicial restraint
C. Legal activism
D. Common law practice


Sagot :

Final answer:

Judicial activism involves actively reviewing and potentially overturning decisions by other branches of government to protect individual rights. Judicial restraint, on the other hand, suggests judges should defer decisions to elected branches and focus on a narrow interpretation of the law.


Explanation:

Judicial activism is a judicial philosophy where judges actively review and potentially overturn decisions or actions by other branches of government, aiming to protect individual rights and liberties. This approach involves judges taking a vigorous or active role in interpreting the Constitution. In contrast, judicial restraint advocates for judges to defer decisions to elected branches and focus on a narrower interpretation of the law.


Learn more about Judicial activism and judicial restraint here:

https://brainly.com/question/29545866


Thank you for participating in our discussion. We value every contribution. Keep sharing knowledge and helping others find the answers they need. Let's create a dynamic and informative learning environment together. IDNLearn.com has the solutions to your questions. Thanks for stopping by, and come back for more insightful information.