IDNLearn.com: Your one-stop platform for getting reliable answers to any question. Discover reliable answers to your questions with our extensive database of expert knowledge.

Which of the following sets of quantum numbers describe valid orbitals? Check all that apply.

A. [tex]\(n=1, \ l=0, \ m=0\)[/tex]
B. [tex]\(n=2, \ l=1, \ m=3\)[/tex]
C. [tex]\(n=2, \ l=2, \ m=2\)[/tex]
D. [tex]\(n=3, \ l=0, \ m=0\)[/tex]
E. [tex]\(n=5, \ l=4, \ m=-3\)[/tex]
F. [tex]\(n=4, \ l=-2, \ m=2\)[/tex]


Sagot :

To determine whether each set of quantum numbers describes a valid orbital, we must check the following conditions for the principal quantum number [tex]\(n\)[/tex], angular momentum quantum number [tex]\(l\)[/tex], and magnetic quantum number [tex]\(m\)[/tex]:

1. [tex]\(n > 0\)[/tex]
2. [tex]\(0 \leq l < n\)[/tex]
3. [tex]\(-l \leq m \leq l\)[/tex]

Let's evaluate each set of quantum numbers one by one:

1. Set [tex]\( (n=1, l=0, m=0) \)[/tex]:
- [tex]\( n = 1 \)[/tex]: [tex]\(n > 0\)[/tex], so this is valid.
- [tex]\( l = 0 \)[/tex]: [tex]\(0 \leq l < n\)[/tex], so this is valid.
- [tex]\( m = 0 \)[/tex]: [tex]\(-l \leq m \leq l\)[/tex], so this is valid.
- Conclusion: This is a valid set of quantum numbers.

2. Set [tex]\( (n=2, l=1, m=3) \)[/tex]:
- [tex]\( n = 2 \)[/tex]: [tex]\(n > 0\)[/tex], so this is valid.
- [tex]\( l = 1 \)[/tex]: [tex]\(0 \leq l < n\)[/tex], so this is valid.
- [tex]\( m = 3 \)[/tex]: [tex]\(-l \leq m \leq l\)[/tex], [tex]\(-1 \leq 3 \leq 1\)[/tex] is not satisfied.
- Conclusion: This is not a valid set of quantum numbers.

3. Set [tex]\( (n=2, l=2, m=2) \)[/tex]:
- [tex]\( n = 2 \)[/tex]: [tex]\(n > 0\)[/tex], so this is valid.
- [tex]\( l = 2 \)[/tex]: [tex]\(0 \leq l < n\)[/tex], [tex]\(0 \leq 2 < 2\)[/tex] is not satisfied.
- [tex]\( m = 2 \)[/tex]: This does not need to be checked further since [tex]\(l\)[/tex] is not valid.
- Conclusion: This is not a valid set of quantum numbers.

4. Set [tex]\( (n=3, l=0, m=0) \)[/tex]:
- [tex]\( n = 3 \)[/tex]: [tex]\(n > 0\)[/tex], so this is valid.
- [tex]\( l = 0 \)[/tex]: [tex]\(0 \leq l < n\)[/tex], so this is valid.
- [tex]\( m = 0 \)[/tex]: [tex]\(-l \leq m \leq l\)[/tex], so this is valid.
- Conclusion: This is a valid set of quantum numbers.

5. Set [tex]\( (n=5, l=4, m=-3) \)[/tex]:
- [tex]\( n = 5 \)[/tex]: [tex]\(n > 0\)[/tex], so this is valid.
- [tex]\( l = 4 \)[/tex]: [tex]\(0 \leq l < n\)[/tex], so this is valid.
- [tex]\( m = -3 \)[/tex]: [tex]\(-l \leq m \leq l\)[/tex], [tex]\(-4 \leq -3 \leq 4\)[/tex] is satisfied.
- Conclusion: This is a valid set of quantum numbers.

6. Set [tex]\( (n=4, l=-2, m=2) \)[/tex]:
- [tex]\( n = 4 \)[/tex]: [tex]\(n > 0\)[/tex], so this is valid.
- [tex]\( l = -2 \)[/tex]: [tex]\(0 \leq l < n\)[/tex], [tex]\(0 \leq -2 < 4\)[/tex] is not satisfied.
- [tex]\( m = 2 \)[/tex]: This does not need to be checked further since [tex]\(l\)[/tex] is not valid.
- Conclusion: This is not a valid set of quantum numbers.

Final Conclusion: The sets of quantum numbers that describe valid orbitals are:
- [tex]\( (n=1, l=0, m=0) \)[/tex]
- [tex]\( (n=3, l=0, m=0) \)[/tex]
- [tex]\( (n=5, l=4, m=-3) \)[/tex]