Expand your knowledge base with the help of IDNLearn.com's extensive answer archive. Discover the information you need from our experienced professionals who provide accurate and reliable answers to all your questions.
Sagot :
Let's analyze and compare the functions [tex]\( f(x) \)[/tex] and [tex]\( g(x) \)[/tex] step by step.
### Function Definitions
- [tex]\( f(x) = 40(1.3)^x \)[/tex]
- [tex]\( g(x) \)[/tex] is provided via a table:
[tex]\[ \begin{array}{|c|c|} \hline x & g(x) \\ \hline 0 & 40 \\ \hline 1 & 56 \\ \hline 2 & 78.4 \\ \hline 3 & 109.76 \\ \hline \end{array} \][/tex]
### Initial Values
Let's compare the initial values (i.e., when [tex]\( x = 0 \)[/tex]):
For [tex]\( f(x) \)[/tex]:
[tex]\[ f(0) = 40 \cdot (1.3)^0 = 40 \cdot 1 = 40 \][/tex]
For [tex]\( g(x) \)[/tex], the table shows [tex]\( g(0) = 40 \)[/tex].
The initial values of [tex]\( f(x) \)[/tex] and [tex]\( g(x) \)[/tex] are the same. Therefore, statement B is correct.
### Growth/Decay Factors
#### For [tex]\( f(x) \)[/tex]:
The growth factor in [tex]\( f(x) \)[/tex] is explicitly given by the base of the exponent, [tex]\( 1.3 \)[/tex]. Hence the growth factor is [tex]\( 1.3 \)[/tex].
#### For [tex]\( g(x) \)[/tex]:
We need to calculate the growth factor by examining the ratios of successive values.
[tex]\[ \frac{g(1)}{g(0)} = \frac{56}{40} = 1.4 \][/tex]
[tex]\[ \frac{g(2)}{g(1)} = \frac{78.4}{56} = 1.4 \][/tex]
[tex]\[ \frac{g(3)}{g(2)} = \frac{109.76}{78.4} = 1.4 \][/tex]
We observe that the growth factor for [tex]\( g(x) \)[/tex] is consistent and is [tex]\( 1.4 \)[/tex].
### Comparisons
Comparing the growth factors:
- The growth factor of [tex]\( f(x) \)[/tex] is [tex]\( 1.3 \)[/tex].
- The growth factor of [tex]\( g(x) \)[/tex] is [tex]\( 1.4 \)[/tex].
Clearly, [tex]\( 1.3 < 1.4 \)[/tex], so the growth factor of [tex]\( f(x) \)[/tex] is less than that of [tex]\( g(x) \)[/tex]. Therefore, statement C is correct.
### Decay Factors
Both [tex]\( f(x) \)[/tex] and [tex]\( g(x) \)[/tex] are growing functions (since their growth factors are greater than 1). Therefore, statements involving decay factors are not applicable here. Hence, statement A is not correct.
### Final Verification:
- Statement B: Correct. The initial values are 40 for both functions.
- Statement C: Correct. The growth factor of [tex]\( f(x) \)[/tex] is less than that of [tex]\( g(x) \)[/tex].
- Statement D: Incorrect. The growth factor of [tex]\( f(x) \)[/tex] is not more than that of [tex]\( g(x) \)[/tex].
### Answer
Based on our analysis, the correct statements are:
[tex]\[ B. \text{The initial values of } f(x) \text{ and } g(x) \text{ are the same.} \][/tex]
[tex]\[ C. \text{The growth factor of } f(x) \text{ is less than the growth factor of } g(x). \][/tex]
### Function Definitions
- [tex]\( f(x) = 40(1.3)^x \)[/tex]
- [tex]\( g(x) \)[/tex] is provided via a table:
[tex]\[ \begin{array}{|c|c|} \hline x & g(x) \\ \hline 0 & 40 \\ \hline 1 & 56 \\ \hline 2 & 78.4 \\ \hline 3 & 109.76 \\ \hline \end{array} \][/tex]
### Initial Values
Let's compare the initial values (i.e., when [tex]\( x = 0 \)[/tex]):
For [tex]\( f(x) \)[/tex]:
[tex]\[ f(0) = 40 \cdot (1.3)^0 = 40 \cdot 1 = 40 \][/tex]
For [tex]\( g(x) \)[/tex], the table shows [tex]\( g(0) = 40 \)[/tex].
The initial values of [tex]\( f(x) \)[/tex] and [tex]\( g(x) \)[/tex] are the same. Therefore, statement B is correct.
### Growth/Decay Factors
#### For [tex]\( f(x) \)[/tex]:
The growth factor in [tex]\( f(x) \)[/tex] is explicitly given by the base of the exponent, [tex]\( 1.3 \)[/tex]. Hence the growth factor is [tex]\( 1.3 \)[/tex].
#### For [tex]\( g(x) \)[/tex]:
We need to calculate the growth factor by examining the ratios of successive values.
[tex]\[ \frac{g(1)}{g(0)} = \frac{56}{40} = 1.4 \][/tex]
[tex]\[ \frac{g(2)}{g(1)} = \frac{78.4}{56} = 1.4 \][/tex]
[tex]\[ \frac{g(3)}{g(2)} = \frac{109.76}{78.4} = 1.4 \][/tex]
We observe that the growth factor for [tex]\( g(x) \)[/tex] is consistent and is [tex]\( 1.4 \)[/tex].
### Comparisons
Comparing the growth factors:
- The growth factor of [tex]\( f(x) \)[/tex] is [tex]\( 1.3 \)[/tex].
- The growth factor of [tex]\( g(x) \)[/tex] is [tex]\( 1.4 \)[/tex].
Clearly, [tex]\( 1.3 < 1.4 \)[/tex], so the growth factor of [tex]\( f(x) \)[/tex] is less than that of [tex]\( g(x) \)[/tex]. Therefore, statement C is correct.
### Decay Factors
Both [tex]\( f(x) \)[/tex] and [tex]\( g(x) \)[/tex] are growing functions (since their growth factors are greater than 1). Therefore, statements involving decay factors are not applicable here. Hence, statement A is not correct.
### Final Verification:
- Statement B: Correct. The initial values are 40 for both functions.
- Statement C: Correct. The growth factor of [tex]\( f(x) \)[/tex] is less than that of [tex]\( g(x) \)[/tex].
- Statement D: Incorrect. The growth factor of [tex]\( f(x) \)[/tex] is not more than that of [tex]\( g(x) \)[/tex].
### Answer
Based on our analysis, the correct statements are:
[tex]\[ B. \text{The initial values of } f(x) \text{ and } g(x) \text{ are the same.} \][/tex]
[tex]\[ C. \text{The growth factor of } f(x) \text{ is less than the growth factor of } g(x). \][/tex]
We are happy to have you as part of our community. Keep asking, answering, and sharing your insights. Together, we can create a valuable knowledge resource. Your questions find answers at IDNLearn.com. Thanks for visiting, and come back for more accurate and reliable solutions.