Find the best solutions to your problems with the help of IDNLearn.com's expert users. Whether your question is simple or complex, our community is here to provide detailed and trustworthy answers quickly and effectively.
When advocating for a ban on smoking in restaurants, the potential contraargument is that the government should not control personal habits. However, public health concerns and individual well-being must be balanced against personal liberties when evaluating smoking policies.
The contraargument that could be anticipated when writing an essay in favor of banning smoking in restaurants is C - El gobierno no debería controlar los hábitos personales de las personas. This argument revolves around the idea that the government should not interfere with personal habits and choices even if they are detrimental to health or the environment.
Opponents of smoking bans may argue that individuals have the freedom of choice to engage in behaviors like smoking, and it is not the role of the government to restrict these personal rights.
However, it is essential to weigh the public health concerns and well-being of individuals against personal liberties when considering policies related to smoking in public spaces.
https://brainly.com/question/38746373