Find the best solutions to your problems with the help of IDNLearn.com's experts. Ask your questions and receive reliable, detailed answers from our dedicated community of experts.
Sagot :
To solve this problem, we need to analyze the given linear function for Jessica's earnings, [tex]\(E(x) = 10x - 30\)[/tex], where [tex]\(x\)[/tex] represents the number of doors she knocks on during the week, and [tex]\(E(x)\)[/tex] is her earnings for the week in dollars.
The [tex]\(y\)[/tex]-intercept of a linear function in the form [tex]\(E(x) = mx + b\)[/tex] is the constant term [tex]\(b\)[/tex]. The [tex]\(y\)[/tex]-intercept represents the value of [tex]\(E(x)\)[/tex] when [tex]\(x = 0\)[/tex].
Given the function [tex]\(E(x) = 10x - 30\)[/tex]:
- The term [tex]\(10x\)[/tex] indicates that Jessica earns [tex]$10 for each door she knocks on. - The term \(-30\) represents the \(y\)-intercept, which is the value of her earnings when she does not knock on any doors (\(x = 0\)). Let's go through each option to determine if they are reasonable interpretations of the \(y\)-intercept: A. If she does not knock on any doors at all during the week, she will lose $[/tex]\[tex]$30$[/tex].
- When [tex]\(x = 0\)[/tex], [tex]\(E(0) = 10(0) - 30 = -30\)[/tex].
- This means if Jessica does not knock on any doors, her earnings for the week will be [tex]\(-\$30\)[/tex], indicating a loss of \[tex]$30 due to her expenses. - This is a reasonable interpretation. B. She can earn \$[/tex]10 per week even if she does not knock on any doors.
- When [tex]\(x = 0\)[/tex], [tex]\(E(0) = -30\)[/tex], not \[tex]$10. - This suggests that she does not earn any money if she does not knock on any doors; instead, she incurs a loss of \$[/tex]30.
- This is not a reasonable interpretation.
C. Her expenses are \[tex]$30 per week. - The \(-\$[/tex]30\) indicates that Jessica has fixed expenses of \[tex]$30 per week. - No matter how many doors she knocks on, she will always have to cover her \$[/tex]30 expenses to break even.
- This is a reasonable interpretation.
D. She will lose \[tex]$10 per week if she does not knock on any doors. - When she does not knock on any doors, she loses \$[/tex]30, not \$10.
- This does not correctly reflect the given equation.
- This is not a reasonable interpretation.
Therefore, the reasonable interpretations of the [tex]\(y\)[/tex]-intercept are options A and C.
The [tex]\(y\)[/tex]-intercept of a linear function in the form [tex]\(E(x) = mx + b\)[/tex] is the constant term [tex]\(b\)[/tex]. The [tex]\(y\)[/tex]-intercept represents the value of [tex]\(E(x)\)[/tex] when [tex]\(x = 0\)[/tex].
Given the function [tex]\(E(x) = 10x - 30\)[/tex]:
- The term [tex]\(10x\)[/tex] indicates that Jessica earns [tex]$10 for each door she knocks on. - The term \(-30\) represents the \(y\)-intercept, which is the value of her earnings when she does not knock on any doors (\(x = 0\)). Let's go through each option to determine if they are reasonable interpretations of the \(y\)-intercept: A. If she does not knock on any doors at all during the week, she will lose $[/tex]\[tex]$30$[/tex].
- When [tex]\(x = 0\)[/tex], [tex]\(E(0) = 10(0) - 30 = -30\)[/tex].
- This means if Jessica does not knock on any doors, her earnings for the week will be [tex]\(-\$30\)[/tex], indicating a loss of \[tex]$30 due to her expenses. - This is a reasonable interpretation. B. She can earn \$[/tex]10 per week even if she does not knock on any doors.
- When [tex]\(x = 0\)[/tex], [tex]\(E(0) = -30\)[/tex], not \[tex]$10. - This suggests that she does not earn any money if she does not knock on any doors; instead, she incurs a loss of \$[/tex]30.
- This is not a reasonable interpretation.
C. Her expenses are \[tex]$30 per week. - The \(-\$[/tex]30\) indicates that Jessica has fixed expenses of \[tex]$30 per week. - No matter how many doors she knocks on, she will always have to cover her \$[/tex]30 expenses to break even.
- This is a reasonable interpretation.
D. She will lose \[tex]$10 per week if she does not knock on any doors. - When she does not knock on any doors, she loses \$[/tex]30, not \$10.
- This does not correctly reflect the given equation.
- This is not a reasonable interpretation.
Therefore, the reasonable interpretations of the [tex]\(y\)[/tex]-intercept are options A and C.
We appreciate every question and answer you provide. Keep engaging and finding the best solutions. This community is the perfect place to learn and grow together. Discover insightful answers at IDNLearn.com. We appreciate your visit and look forward to assisting you again.