Answered

Get clear, concise, and accurate answers to your questions on IDNLearn.com. Ask anything and receive comprehensive, well-informed responses from our dedicated team of experts.

In Furman v. Georgia (1972), William Furman claimed his sentence was:

A. appropriate.
B. overly lenient.
C. cruel and unusual.
D. accidental.

Sagot :

GinnyAnsweridn

Final answer:

In 1972, Furman v. Georgia addressed the constitutionality of capital punishment, resulting in a temporary ban due to cruel and unusual punishment concerns.


Explanation:

Furman v. Georgia (1972) was a landmark Supreme Court case that resulted in a temporary halt to capital punishment in the United States. William Furman argued that his sentence was cruel and unusual, leading to the ruling that the arbitrary application of the death penalty violated the Eighth and Fourteenth Amendments of the Constitution.


Learn more about Capital punishment and constitutional rights here:

https://brainly.com/question/33270281


We appreciate your contributions to this forum. Don't forget to check back for the latest answers. Keep asking, answering, and sharing useful information. IDNLearn.com provides the answers you need. Thank you for visiting, and see you next time for more valuable insights.