IDNLearn.com makes it easy to get reliable answers from experts and enthusiasts alike. Our platform provides prompt, accurate answers from experts ready to assist you with any question you may have.
Circular reasoning asserts conclusions without valid support, hasty generalization draws broad conclusions from limited examples, and biased sample uses skewed evidence for conclusions.
Circular reasoning is a fallacy that occurs when the conclusion is repeated or asserted without providing valid reasons to support it. This type of fallacy involves supporting a premise with the same premise, creating the illusion of validity without actual evidence.
In contrast, hasty generalization is a fallacy where a broad conclusion is drawn from insufficient examples. It occurs when a speaker jumps to a generalization without an adequate number of examples to support the claim.
Biased sample is another weak induction fallacy where the evidence used to draw a conclusion is skewed or prejudiced in some way, leading to an unreliable or unfair inference.
https://brainly.com/question/29368484