Answered

Join the IDNLearn.com community and start finding the answers you need today. Join our community to receive timely and reliable responses to your questions from knowledgeable professionals.

In their ruling on the case of Abington Township School District v. Schempp, the Supreme Court cited an earlier court decision in the following statement:

"We repeat and again reaffirm that neither a State nor the Federal Government can constitutionally force a person 'to profess a belief or disbelief in any religion.'"

This ruling is based on which part of the Constitution?

A. The Establishment Clause of the First Amendment
B. The powers of the states reserved in the Tenth Amendment

Sagot :

GinnyAnsweridn

Final answer:

The ruling in Abington Township School District v. Schempp is based on the Establishment Clause of the First Amendment, which protects individuals from government-imposed religious beliefs or restrictions on their own beliefs.


Explanation:

The ruling in Abington Township School District v. Schempp, where the Supreme Court cited that neither the State nor the Federal Government can force a person to profess a belief or disbelief in any religion, is based on the Establishment Clause of the First Amendment.

The Establishment Clause prohibits the government from endorsing a state-sponsored religion or favoring some religious beliefs over others or religion over non-religion, emphasizing the separation between church and state.

This clause ensures that individuals are protected from having government-imposed religious beliefs or having their own religious beliefs restricted by authorities.


Learn more about Establishment Clause here:

https://brainly.com/question/29618695


Thank you for using this platform to share and learn. Don't hesitate to keep asking and answering. We value every contribution you make. IDNLearn.com has the answers you need. Thank you for visiting, and we look forward to helping you again soon.